EPYC 9754 vs Xeon Platinum 8570

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9754

128 Cores256 Thrd360 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2023

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Xeon Platinum 8570

56 Cores112 Thrd350 WWMax: 4 GHz2023

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

EPYC 9754

128 / 256

98,450

+5.0%

Ryzen AI Max+ 395

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7980X

Ryzen Threadripper 9980X

Xeon Platinum 8570

56 / 112

93,722

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9754

2023

Why buy it

✅+60.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8570 across 25 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 9.8 PassMark/$ ($11,900 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Platinum 8570

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.5% higher average FPS across 25 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,305 less on MSRP ($9,595 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
✅Delivers 18.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 9.8 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($9,595 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (65,000 vs 104,584).

EPYC 9754

2023

Xeon Platinum 8570

2023

Why buy it

✅+60.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.5% higher average FPS across 25 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,305 less on MSRP ($9,595 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).
✅Delivers 18.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 9.8 vs 8.3 PassMark/$ ($9,595 MSRP vs $11,900 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8570 across 25 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.3 vs 9.8 PassMark/$ ($11,900 MSRP vs $9,595 MSRP).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (65,000 vs 104,584).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 9754 better than Xeon Platinum 8570?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Xeon Platinum 8570 is ahead with a 10.5% average FPS lead across 25 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9754 pulls ahead with 60.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 9754 is the better fit. You are getting 60.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 128 cores and 256 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 9754 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Platinum 8570 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 9754 is 24.0% more expensive on MSRP at $11,900 MSRP versus $9,595 MSRP, and it gives you 60.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. The trade-off is that Xeon Platinum 8570 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 10.5% average FPS lead across 25 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Platinum 8570 is also 18.1% better value on MSRP (9.8 vs 8.3 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8570 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra cache should hold up really well in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9754 Benchmark Check

Xeon Platinum 8570 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9754	Xeon Platinum 8570
1080p
low	163 FPS	188 FPS
medium	134 FPS	165 FPS
high	113 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	89 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	155 FPS
medium	114 FPS	131 FPS
high	90 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	68 FPS	70 FPS
medium	58 FPS	63 FPS
high	45 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	40 FPS

Open EPYC 9754 Open Xeon Platinum 8570

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9754	Xeon Platinum 8570
1080p
low	238 FPS	282 FPS
medium	211 FPS	250 FPS
high	174 FPS	206 FPS
ultra	138 FPS	169 FPS
1440p
low	195 FPS	230 FPS
medium	177 FPS	208 FPS
high	151 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	116 FPS	141 FPS
4K
low	121 FPS	143 FPS
medium	112 FPS	131 FPS
high	97 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	99 FPS

Open EPYC 9754 Open Xeon Platinum 8570

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9754	Xeon Platinum 8570
1080p
low	650 FPS	910 FPS
medium	541 FPS	838 FPS
high	481 FPS	791 FPS
ultra	422 FPS	698 FPS
1440p
low	503 FPS	782 FPS
medium	418 FPS	716 FPS
high	365 FPS	673 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	601 FPS
4K
low	371 FPS	528 FPS
medium	289 FPS	444 FPS
high	246 FPS	396 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	330 FPS

Open EPYC 9754 Open Xeon Platinum 8570

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9754	Xeon Platinum 8570
1080p
low	876 FPS	971 FPS
medium	793 FPS	875 FPS
high	682 FPS	754 FPS
ultra	592 FPS	654 FPS
1440p
low	695 FPS	793 FPS
medium	602 FPS	691 FPS
high	515 FPS	593 FPS
ultra	435 FPS	510 FPS
4K
low	495 FPS	572 FPS
medium	441 FPS	514 FPS
high	387 FPS	454 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	391 FPS

Open EPYC 9754 Open Xeon Platinum 8570

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9754 and Xeon Platinum 8570

EPYC 9754

The EPYC 9754 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Bergamo (2023) architecture. It features 128 cores and 256 threads. Base frequency is 2.25 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 98,450 points. Launch price was $11,900.

Xeon Platinum 8570

The Xeon Platinum 8570 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 5600 MT/s (1 DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 93,722 points. Launch price was $9,595.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9754 packs 128 cores / 256 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8570 offers 56 cores / 112 threads — the EPYC 9754 has 72 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the EPYC 9754 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8570 — a 25.4% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8570 (base: 2.25 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 9754 uses the Bergamo (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8570 uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9754 scores 98,450 against the Xeon Platinum 8570's 93,722 — a 4.9% lead for the EPYC 9754. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 104,584 vs 65,000 (46.7% advantage for the EPYC 9754). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,634 vs 1,960, a 18.1% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8570 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 16,825 vs 18,960 (11.9% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8570). L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9754 vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8570.

Feature	EPYC 9754	Xeon Platinum 8570
Cores / Threads	128 / 256+129%	56 / 112
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	4 GHz+29%
Base Clock	2.25 GHz+7%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)	300 MB (total)+17%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	5 nm-29%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Bergamo (2023)	Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark	98,450+5%	93,722
Cinebench R23 Multi	104,584+61%	65,000
Geekbench 6 Single	1,634	1,960+20%
Geekbench 6 Multi	16,825	18,960+13%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9754 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8570 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The EPYC 9754 supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9754) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8570). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9754) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8570) — the EPYC 9754 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9754) and Intel C741 (Xeon Platinum 8570).

Feature	EPYC 9754	Xeon Platinum 8570
Socket	SP5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity	6 TB+50%	4 TB
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9754) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8570). Primary use case: EPYC 9754 targets Data Center / Cloud Native, Xeon Platinum 8570 targets Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9754 rivals Xeon 6780E; Xeon Platinum 8570 rivals AMD EPYC 9554.

Feature	EPYC 9754	Xeon Platinum 8570
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V, SEV-SNP	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Data Center / Cloud Native	Server

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9754 launched at $11900 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8570 debuted at $9595. On MSRP ($11900 vs $9595), the Xeon Platinum 8570 is $2305 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9754 delivers 8.3 pts/$ vs 9.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8570 — making the Xeon Platinum 8570 the 16.6% better value option.