Xeon Platinum 8368Q vs Xeon W-3345

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8368Q

38 Cores76 Thrd270 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2021

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon W-3345

24 Cores48 Thrd250 WWMax: 4 GHz2021

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q

2021

Why buy it

  • +58.3% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 36 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3345 across 20 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (46,681 vs 48,140).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 19.3 PassMark/$ ($7,719 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).

Xeon W-3345

2021

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 20 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $5,220 less on MSRP ($2,499 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
  • Delivers 218.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.3 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
  • Draws 250W instead of 270W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 57 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3345 better than Xeon Platinum 8368Q?
Yes. Xeon W-3345 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 6.7% average FPS lead across 20 shared CPU game tests in our data and 3.1% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-3345 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 6.7% more average FPS across 20 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3345 is the better fit. You are getting 3.1% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon W-3345 is the smarter buy today. Xeon W-3345 is $5,220 cheaper on MSRP at $2,499 MSRP versus $7,719 MSRP, and it gives you a 6.7% average FPS lead across 20 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 218.5% better value on MSRP (19.3 vs 6.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon W-3345 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more overall headroom and a better platform outlook.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetXeon Platinum 8368QXeon W-3345
1080p
low190 FPS194 FPS
medium154 FPS155 FPS
high126 FPS127 FPS
ultra98 FPS98 FPS
1440p
low157 FPS159 FPS
medium123 FPS124 FPS
high96 FPS97 FPS
ultra76 FPS77 FPS
4K
low72 FPS73 FPS
medium60 FPS60 FPS
high47 FPS47 FPS
ultra39 FPS39 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetXeon Platinum 8368QXeon W-3345
1080p
low496 FPS497 FPS
medium431 FPS431 FPS
high345 FPS345 FPS
ultra286 FPS285 FPS
1440p
low425 FPS425 FPS
medium375 FPS376 FPS
high310 FPS309 FPS
ultra247 FPS245 FPS
4K
low264 FPS264 FPS
medium237 FPS237 FPS
high208 FPS209 FPS
ultra174 FPS174 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetXeon Platinum 8368QXeon W-3345
1080p
low960 FPS1025 FPS
medium836 FPS973 FPS
high790 FPS914 FPS
ultra701 FPS826 FPS
1440p
low759 FPS841 FPS
medium652 FPS744 FPS
high616 FPS699 FPS
ultra547 FPS626 FPS
4K
low487 FPS540 FPS
medium383 FPS444 FPS
high340 FPS390 FPS
ultra278 FPS320 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetXeon Platinum 8368QXeon W-3345
1080p
low930 FPS938 FPS
medium844 FPS847 FPS
high730 FPS732 FPS
ultra631 FPS635 FPS
1440p
low728 FPS735 FPS
medium641 FPS645 FPS
high551 FPS554 FPS
ultra473 FPS481 FPS
4K
low525 FPS534 FPS
medium470 FPS477 FPS
high413 FPS419 FPS
ultra358 FPS362 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Xeon W-3345

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8368Q

The Xeon Platinum 8368Q is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,681 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Xeon W-3345

The Xeon W-3345 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,140 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Xeon Platinum 8368Q packs 38 cores / 76 threads, while the Xeon W-3345 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8368Q has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3345 — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3345 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8368Q uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon W-3345 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8368Q scores 46,681 against the Xeon W-3345's 48,140 — a 3.1% lead for the Xeon W-3345. L3 cache: 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q vs 36 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3345.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8368QXeon W-3345
Cores / Threads
38 / 76+58%
24 / 48
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
4 GHz+8%
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
3 GHz+15%
L3 Cache
57 MB (total)+58%
36 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
10 nm
10 nm
Architecture
Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark
46,681
48,140+3%
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA4189 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3,C621A (Xeon Platinum 8368Q) and SP3,C621A (Xeon W-3345).

FeatureXeon Platinum 8368QXeon W-3345
Socket
LGA4189
LGA4189
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
3200
3200
Max RAM Capacity
4096
4096
RAM Channels
8
8
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128
128
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8368Q rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; Xeon W-3345 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8368QXeon W-3345
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon Platinum 8368Q launched at $7719 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3345 debuted at $2499. On MSRP ($7719 vs $2499), the Xeon W-3345 is $5220 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8368Q delivers 6.0 pts/$ vs 19.3 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3345 — making the Xeon W-3345 the 104.4% better value option.

FeatureXeon Platinum 8368QXeon W-3345
MSRP
$7719
$2499-68%
Performance per Dollar
6.0
19.3+222%
Release Date
2021
2021