
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Popular choices:

Xeon W-3345
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
2021Why buy it
- ✅+58.3% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 36 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3345 across 20 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (46,681 vs 48,140).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 19.3 PassMark/$ ($7,719 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
Xeon W-3345
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 20 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $5,220 less on MSRP ($2,499 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 218.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.3 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 270W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 57 MB).
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
2021Xeon W-3345
2021Why buy it
- ✅+58.3% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 36 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 20 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $5,220 less on MSRP ($2,499 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 218.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.3 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 270W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3345 across 20 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (46,681 vs 48,140).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 19.3 PassMark/$ ($7,719 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 57 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-3345 better than Xeon Platinum 8368Q?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Platinum 8368Q | Xeon W-3345 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Platinum 8368Q | Xeon W-3345 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 496 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 431 FPS | 431 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 286 FPS | 285 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 375 FPS | 376 FPS |
| high | 310 FPS | 309 FPS |
| ultra | 247 FPS | 245 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 264 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 174 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Platinum 8368Q | Xeon W-3345 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 960 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 836 FPS | 973 FPS |
| high | 790 FPS | 914 FPS |
| ultra | 701 FPS | 826 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 759 FPS | 841 FPS |
| medium | 652 FPS | 744 FPS |
| high | 616 FPS | 699 FPS |
| ultra | 547 FPS | 626 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 487 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 383 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 340 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 278 FPS | 320 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Platinum 8368Q | Xeon W-3345 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 930 FPS | 938 FPS |
| medium | 844 FPS | 847 FPS |
| high | 730 FPS | 732 FPS |
| ultra | 631 FPS | 635 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 728 FPS | 735 FPS |
| medium | 641 FPS | 645 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 554 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 481 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 534 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 477 FPS |
| high | 413 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 362 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8368Q and Xeon W-3345

Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
The Xeon Platinum 8368Q is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,681 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W-3345
Xeon W-3345
The Xeon W-3345 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,140 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon Platinum 8368Q packs 38 cores / 76 threads, while the Xeon W-3345 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8368Q has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3345 — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3345 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8368Q uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon W-3345 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8368Q scores 46,681 against the Xeon W-3345's 48,140 — a 3.1% lead for the Xeon W-3345. L3 cache: 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q vs 36 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3345.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368Q | Xeon W-3345 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 38 / 76+58% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 4 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 3 GHz+15% |
| L3 Cache | 57 MB (total)+58% | 36 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Ice Lake-SP (2021) | Ice Lake-W (2021) |
| PassMark | 46,681 | 48,140+3% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA4189 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP3,C621A (Xeon Platinum 8368Q) and SP3,C621A (Xeon W-3345).
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368Q | Xeon W-3345 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4189 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8368Q rivals Xeon Platinum 8362; Xeon W-3345 rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368Q | Xeon W-3345 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Platinum 8368Q launched at $7719 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3345 debuted at $2499. On MSRP ($7719 vs $2499), the Xeon W-3345 is $5220 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8368Q delivers 6.0 pts/$ vs 19.3 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3345 — making the Xeon W-3345 the 104.4% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8368Q | Xeon W-3345 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $7719 | $2499-68% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.0 | 19.3+222% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













