
Xeon Gold 6444Y
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 6444Y
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,097 less on MSRP ($3,622 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 115.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.0 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($3,622 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (45 MB vs 57 MB).
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
2021Why buy it
- ✅+26.7% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 45 MB).
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6444Y across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (46,681 vs 47,176).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 13.0 PassMark/$ ($7,719 MSRP vs $3,622 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6444Y moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Gold 6444Y
2023Xeon Platinum 8368Q
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $4,097 less on MSRP ($3,622 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 115.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.0 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($3,622 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+26.7% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 45 MB).
- ✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (45 MB vs 57 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6444Y across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (46,681 vs 47,176).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 13.0 PassMark/$ ($7,719 MSRP vs $3,622 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6444Y moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6444Y better than Xeon Platinum 8368Q?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6444Y | Xeon Platinum 8368Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 205 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6444Y | Xeon Platinum 8368Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 431 FPS |
| high | 354 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 293 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 375 FPS |
| high | 313 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 240 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 174 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6444Y | Xeon Platinum 8368Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1025 FPS | 960 FPS |
| medium | 1005 FPS | 836 FPS |
| high | 949 FPS | 790 FPS |
| ultra | 862 FPS | 701 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 880 FPS | 759 FPS |
| medium | 777 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 722 FPS | 616 FPS |
| ultra | 651 FPS | 547 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 399 FPS | 340 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 278 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6444Y | Xeon Platinum 8368Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1179 FPS | 930 FPS |
| medium | 1015 FPS | 844 FPS |
| high | 907 FPS | 730 FPS |
| ultra | 767 FPS | 631 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 934 FPS | 728 FPS |
| medium | 806 FPS | 641 FPS |
| high | 681 FPS | 551 FPS |
| ultra | 574 FPS | 473 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 684 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 597 FPS | 470 FPS |
| high | 516 FPS | 413 FPS |
| ultra | 431 FPS | 358 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6444Y and Xeon Platinum 8368Q

Xeon Gold 6444Y
Xeon Gold 6444Y
The Xeon Gold 6444Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 47,176 points. Launch price was $1,517.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
The Xeon Platinum 8368Q is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,681 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 6444Y packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8368Q has 22 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6444Y versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6444Y (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6444Y uses the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6444Y scores 47,176 against the Xeon Platinum 8368Q's 46,681 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon Gold 6444Y. L3 cache: 45 MB on the Xeon Gold 6444Y vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6444Y | Xeon Platinum 8368Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 38 / 76+138% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+8% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+38% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 45 MB | 57 MB (total)+27% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 47,176+1% | 46,681 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 6444Y uses the LGA4677 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Xeon Gold 6444Y versus 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q — the Xeon Gold 6444Y supports 54.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 80 (Xeon Gold 6444Y) vs 128 (Xeon Platinum 8368Q) — the Xeon Platinum 8368Q offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon Gold 6444Y) and SP3,C621A (Xeon Platinum 8368Q).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6444Y | Xeon Platinum 8368Q |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4677 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+75% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 80 | 128+60% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6444Y rivals EPYC 9384X; Xeon Platinum 8368Q rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6444Y | Xeon Platinum 8368Q |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Gold 6444Y launched at $3622 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q debuted at $7719. On MSRP ($3622 vs $7719), the Xeon Gold 6444Y is $4097 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 6444Y delivers 13.0 pts/$ vs 6.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8368Q — making the Xeon Gold 6444Y the 73.2% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6444Y | Xeon Platinum 8368Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3622-53% | $7719 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.0+117% | 6.0 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













