PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.5% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $7,390 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1027.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 46,681).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 57 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8368Q, which brings 38 cores / 76 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q

2021

Why buy it

✅+108.1% higher PassMark.
✅+78.1% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 38 cores / 76 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($7,719 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Xeon Platinum 8368Q

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.5% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $7,390 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1027.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $7,719 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.

Why buy it

✅+108.1% higher PassMark.
✅+78.1% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 38 cores / 76 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 46,681).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 57 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8368Q, which brings 38 cores / 76 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($7,719 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon Platinum 8368Q?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Platinum 8368Q makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8368Q is the better fit. You are getting 108.1% better PassMark, backed by 38 cores and 76 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 78.1% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 3700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 3700X is $7,390 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $7,719 MSRP, and it gives you a 11.5% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon Platinum 8368Q is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 108.1% better PassMark. It is also 1027.3% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 6.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8368Q is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019), 78.1% larger total L3 cache (57 MB vs 32 MB), more multi-core headroom with 38 cores / 76 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 3700X Benchmark Check

Xeon Platinum 8368Q Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
1080p
low	200 FPS	190 FPS
medium	163 FPS	154 FPS
high	137 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	156 FPS	157 FPS
medium	121 FPS	123 FPS
high	100 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	84 FPS	72 FPS
medium	71 FPS	60 FPS
high	56 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	39 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon Platinum 8368Q

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
1080p
low	561 FPS	496 FPS
medium	525 FPS	431 FPS
high	428 FPS	345 FPS
ultra	383 FPS	286 FPS
1440p
low	545 FPS	425 FPS
medium	471 FPS	375 FPS
high	394 FPS	310 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	247 FPS
4K
low	350 FPS	264 FPS
medium	304 FPS	237 FPS
high	274 FPS	208 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	174 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon Platinum 8368Q

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
1080p
low	561 FPS	960 FPS
medium	561 FPS	836 FPS
high	561 FPS	790 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	701 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	759 FPS
medium	561 FPS	652 FPS
high	538 FPS	616 FPS
ultra	470 FPS	547 FPS
4K
low	499 FPS	487 FPS
medium	394 FPS	383 FPS
high	343 FPS	340 FPS
ultra	275 FPS	278 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon Platinum 8368Q

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
1080p
low	561 FPS	930 FPS
medium	561 FPS	844 FPS
high	561 FPS	730 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	631 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	728 FPS
medium	561 FPS	641 FPS
high	561 FPS	551 FPS
ultra	555 FPS	473 FPS
4K
low	561 FPS	525 FPS
medium	501 FPS	470 FPS
high	447 FPS	413 FPS
ultra	396 FPS	358 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon Platinum 8368Q

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon Platinum 8368Q

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon Platinum 8368Q

The Xeon Platinum 8368Q is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 46,681 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8368Q has 30 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q — a 17.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon Platinum 8368Q's 46,681 — a 70.2% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8368Q. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	38 / 76+375%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+19%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+38%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB	57 MB (total)+78%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm, 12 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	22,430	46,681+108%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8368Q — the Xeon Platinum 8368Q supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8368Q supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8368Q). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 128 (Xeon Platinum 8368Q) — the Xeon Platinum 8368Q offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and SP3,C621A (Xeon Platinum 8368Q).

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Socket	AM4	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	3200+79900%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+3276700%	4096
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	128+433%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8368Q). Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8368Q rivals Xeon Platinum 8362.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon Platinum 8368Q
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8368Q debuted at $7719. On MSRP ($329 vs $7719), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $7390 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 6.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8368Q — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 167.4% better value option.