PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +29.7% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,315 less on MSRP ($3,899 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
✅Delivers 92.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.6 vs 12.8 PassMark/$ ($3,899 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌29.6% higher power demand at 350W vs 270W.

Xeon Platinum 8368

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 270W instead of 350W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (20,000 vs 48,000).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.8 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($7,214 MSRP vs $3,899 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

2023

Xeon Platinum 8368

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +29.7% higher average FPS across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,315 less on MSRP ($3,899 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
✅Delivers 92.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.6 vs 12.8 PassMark/$ ($3,899 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Draws 270W instead of 350W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌29.6% higher power demand at 350W vs 270W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX across 48 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (20,000 vs 48,000).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.8 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($7,214 MSRP vs $3,899 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX better than Xeon Platinum 8368?

Yes. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 29.7% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data, 140% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, 4.2% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 29.7% more average FPS across 48 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 128 MB vs 57 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is the better fit. You are getting 140% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 124.6% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 57 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is the smarter buy today. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is $3,315 cheaper on MSRP at $3,899 MSRP versus $7,214 MSRP, and it gives you a 29.7% average FPS lead across 48 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 92.7% better value on MSRP (24.6 vs 12.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with sTR5 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 57 MB, and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 38/76. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX Benchmark Check

Xeon Platinum 8368 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX	Xeon Platinum 8368
1080p
low	314 FPS	185 FPS
medium	289 FPS	149 FPS
high	240 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	203 FPS	94 FPS
1440p
low	278 FPS	154 FPS
medium	231 FPS	120 FPS
high	178 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	158 FPS	74 FPS
4K
low	191 FPS	72 FPS
medium	158 FPS	60 FPS
high	121 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	38 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX Open Xeon Platinum 8368

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX	Xeon Platinum 8368
1080p
low	807 FPS	412 FPS
medium	688 FPS	361 FPS
high	535 FPS	294 FPS
ultra	467 FPS	235 FPS
1440p
low	666 FPS	353 FPS
medium	591 FPS	314 FPS
high	474 FPS	264 FPS
ultra	384 FPS	203 FPS
4K
low	372 FPS	219 FPS
medium	335 FPS	198 FPS
high	306 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	268 FPS	135 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX Open Xeon Platinum 8368

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX	Xeon Platinum 8368
1080p
low	891 FPS	935 FPS
medium	723 FPS	817 FPS
high	649 FPS	766 FPS
ultra	552 FPS	680 FPS
1440p
low	714 FPS	746 FPS
medium	580 FPS	643 FPS
high	508 FPS	603 FPS
ultra	427 FPS	535 FPS
4K
low	508 FPS	479 FPS
medium	419 FPS	378 FPS
high	375 FPS	334 FPS
ultra	311 FPS	272 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX Open Xeon Platinum 8368

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX	Xeon Platinum 8368
1080p
low	1116 FPS	911 FPS
medium	1002 FPS	828 FPS
high	879 FPS	714 FPS
ultra	792 FPS	613 FPS
1440p
low	872 FPS	712 FPS
medium	768 FPS	625 FPS
high	674 FPS	537 FPS
ultra	587 FPS	460 FPS
4K
low	636 FPS	514 FPS
medium	568 FPS	459 FPS
high	504 FPS	403 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	351 FPS

Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX Open Xeon Platinum 8368

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Xeon Platinum 8368

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 95,891 points. Launch price was $3,899.

Xeon Platinum 8368

The Xeon Platinum 8368 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 92,054 points. Launch price was $7,214.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8368 offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8368 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368 — a 43.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX (base: 4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX uses the Storm Peak (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8368 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX scores 95,891 against the Xeon Platinum 8368's 92,054 — a 4.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 48,000 vs 20,000 (82.4% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,669 vs 1,961, a 30.6% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 22,298 vs 25,000 (11.4% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8368). L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX	Xeon Platinum 8368
Cores / Threads	32 / 64	38 / 76+19%
Boost Clock	5.3 GHz+56%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	4 GHz+67%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	128 MB (total)+125%	57 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm-50%	10 nm
Architecture	Storm Peak (2023)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	95,891+4%	92,054
Cinebench R23 Multi	48,000+140%	20,000
Geekbench 6 Single	2,669+36%	1,961
Geekbench 6 Multi	22,298	25,000+12%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8368 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8368 — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 198.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8368) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8368).

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX	Xeon Platinum 8368
Socket	sTR5	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	2048 GB	6 TB+200%
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+100%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8368). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX targets Professional Workstation, Xeon Platinum 8368 targets Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX rivals Xeon w7-3465X; Xeon Platinum 8368 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX	Xeon Platinum 8368
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Professional Workstation	Server

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX launched at $3899 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8368 debuted at $7214. On MSRP ($3899 vs $7214), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is $3315 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX delivers 24.6 pts/$ vs 12.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8368 — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX the 63.4% better value option.