
Xeon Platinum 8360Y
Popular choices:

Xeon w7-3455
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Platinum 8360Y
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 270W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3455 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (54,078 vs 54,925).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (54 MB vs 68 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 22.1 PassMark/$ ($5,383 MSRP vs $2,489 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-3455 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon w7-3455
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (68 MB vs 54 MB).
- ✅Costs $2,894 less on MSRP ($2,489 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 119.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.1 vs 10.0 PassMark/$ ($2,489 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon Platinum 8360Y
2021Xeon w7-3455
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 270W, a 20W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (68 MB vs 54 MB).
- ✅Costs $2,894 less on MSRP ($2,489 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 119.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 22.1 vs 10.0 PassMark/$ ($2,489 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3455 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (54,078 vs 54,925).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (54 MB vs 68 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 22.1 PassMark/$ ($5,383 MSRP vs $2,489 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-3455 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w7-3455 better than Xeon Platinum 8360Y?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Platinum 8360Y | Xeon w7-3455 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 311 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 301 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 106 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Platinum 8360Y | Xeon w7-3455 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 412 FPS | 682 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 593 FPS |
| high | 294 FPS | 482 FPS |
| ultra | 235 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 341 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 324 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 234 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Platinum 8360Y | Xeon w7-3455 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 971 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 849 FPS | 1057 FPS |
| high | 803 FPS | 974 FPS |
| ultra | 712 FPS | 834 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 774 FPS | 1002 FPS |
| medium | 668 FPS | 888 FPS |
| high | 631 FPS | 802 FPS |
| ultra | 560 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 497 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 393 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 461 FPS |
| ultra | 285 FPS | 397 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Platinum 8360Y | Xeon w7-3455 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 954 FPS | 1291 FPS |
| medium | 863 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 745 FPS | 982 FPS |
| ultra | 634 FPS | 850 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 745 FPS | 1045 FPS |
| medium | 652 FPS | 906 FPS |
| high | 559 FPS | 782 FPS |
| ultra | 475 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 537 FPS | 778 FPS |
| medium | 479 FPS | 679 FPS |
| high | 420 FPS | 583 FPS |
| ultra | 362 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Platinum 8360Y and Xeon w7-3455

Xeon Platinum 8360Y
Xeon Platinum 8360Y
The Xeon Platinum 8360Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 36 cores and 72 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 54 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 54,078 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon w7-3455
Xeon w7-3455
The Xeon w7-3455 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 67.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 54,925 points. Launch price was $2,489.
Processing Power
The Xeon Platinum 8360Y packs 36 cores / 72 threads, while the Xeon w7-3455 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8360Y has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8360Y versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3455 — a 31.3% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3455 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Xeon Platinum 8360Y uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon w7-3455 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Platinum 8360Y scores 54,078 against the Xeon w7-3455's 54,925 — a 1.6% lead for the Xeon w7-3455. L3 cache: 54 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8360Y vs 67.5 MB on the Xeon w7-3455.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8360Y | Xeon w7-3455 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 36 / 72+50% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz | 4.8 GHz+37% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz+4% |
| L3 Cache | 54 MB (total) | 67.5 MB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Ice Lake-SP (2021) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 54,078 | 54,925+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,900 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,898 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Platinum 8360Y uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-3455 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8360Y versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-3455 — the Xeon Platinum 8360Y supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 64 (Xeon Platinum 8360Y) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3455) — the Xeon w7-3455 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C621A (Xeon Platinum 8360Y) and Intel W790 (Xeon w7-3455).
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8360Y | Xeon w7-3455 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4189 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 3200+63900% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 GB+104857500% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 64 | 112+75% |
Advanced Features
Only the Xeon w7-3455 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8360Y) vs true (Xeon w7-3455). Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8360Y rivals EPYC 7543; Xeon w7-3455 rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8360Y | Xeon w7-3455 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Platinum 8360Y launched at $5383 MSRP, while the Xeon w7-3455 debuted at $2489. On MSRP ($5383 vs $2489), the Xeon w7-3455 is $2894 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Platinum 8360Y delivers 10.0 pts/$ vs 22.1 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3455 — making the Xeon w7-3455 the 74.9% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Platinum 8360Y | Xeon w7-3455 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5383 | $2489-54% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.0 | 22.1+121% |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













