
Ryzen 9 7940HX
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8360Y
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 7940HX
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 250W, a 195W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 610M, while Xeon Platinum 8360Y needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (53,628 vs 54,078).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8360Y, which brings 36 cores / 72 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Platinum 8360Y
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 36 cores / 72 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7940HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $5,383 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7940HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌354.5% higher power demand at 250W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7940HX moves to FL1 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7940HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 7940HX
2024Xeon Platinum 8360Y
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 250W, a 195W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 610M, while Xeon Platinum 8360Y needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 36 cores / 72 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 28.
- ✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (53,628 vs 54,078).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8360Y, which brings 36 cores / 72 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 7940HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $5,383 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 7940HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌354.5% higher power demand at 250W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 7940HX moves to FL1 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 7940HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 7940HX better than Xeon Platinum 8360Y?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7940HX | Xeon Platinum 8360Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 293 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 217 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7940HX | Xeon Platinum 8360Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 690 FPS | 412 FPS |
| medium | 574 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 235 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 585 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 502 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 390 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 305 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 286 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 253 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 135 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7940HX | Xeon Platinum 8360Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 888 FPS | 971 FPS |
| medium | 708 FPS | 849 FPS |
| high | 615 FPS | 803 FPS |
| ultra | 531 FPS | 712 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 714 FPS | 774 FPS |
| medium | 570 FPS | 668 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 631 FPS |
| ultra | 416 FPS | 560 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 393 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 322 FPS | 285 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 7940HX | Xeon Platinum 8360Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1128 FPS | 954 FPS |
| medium | 1006 FPS | 863 FPS |
| high | 873 FPS | 745 FPS |
| ultra | 768 FPS | 634 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 898 FPS | 745 FPS |
| medium | 788 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 687 FPS | 559 FPS |
| ultra | 583 FPS | 475 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 646 FPS | 537 FPS |
| medium | 576 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 362 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 7940HX and Xeon Platinum 8360Y


Ryzen 9 7940HX
Ryzen 9 7940HX
The Ryzen 9 7940HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2024-01-01. It is based on the Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 53,628 points. Launch price was $600.

Xeon Platinum 8360Y
Xeon Platinum 8360Y
The Xeon Platinum 8360Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 36 cores and 72 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 54 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 54,078 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 7940HX packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8360Y offers 36 cores / 72 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8360Y has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7940HX versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8360Y — a 39.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940HX (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7940HX uses the Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8360Y uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 53,628 against the Xeon Platinum 8360Y's 54,078 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8360Y. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7940HX vs 54 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8360Y.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7940HX | Xeon Platinum 8360Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 36 / 72+125% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+49% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+19% | 54 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm-50% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 53,628 | 54,078 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 7940HX uses the FL1 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8360Y uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5200 on the Ryzen 9 7940HX versus 3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8360Y — the Ryzen 9 7940HX supports 47.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8360Y supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 7940HX) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8360Y). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 9 7940HX) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8360Y) — the Xeon Platinum 8360Y offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FL1 (Ryzen 9 7940HX) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8360Y).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7940HX | Xeon Platinum 8360Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FL1 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5200+63% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 4096+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 64+129% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7940HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 9 7940HX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8360Y). The Ryzen 9 7940HX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 610M), while the Xeon Platinum 8360Y requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7940HX rivals Core i9-13900HX; Xeon Platinum 8360Y rivals EPYC 7543.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7940HX | Xeon Platinum 8360Y |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon 610M | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












