
Xeon Gold 6248R
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8268
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 6248R
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,602 less on MSRP ($2,700 MSRP vs $6,302 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 135.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.1 vs 5.6 PassMark/$ ($2,700 MSRP vs $6,302 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon Platinum 8268
2019Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6248R across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (35,081 vs 35,434).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($6,302 MSRP vs $2,700 MSRP).
Xeon Gold 6248R
2020Xeon Platinum 8268
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,602 less on MSRP ($2,700 MSRP vs $6,302 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 135.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.1 vs 5.6 PassMark/$ ($2,700 MSRP vs $6,302 MSRP).
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6248R across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (35,081 vs 35,434).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($6,302 MSRP vs $2,700 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6248R better than Xeon Platinum 8268?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6248R | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6248R | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 444 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 317 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 249 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 366 FPS |
| medium | 338 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 279 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 148 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6248R | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 886 FPS | 877 FPS |
| medium | 886 FPS | 877 FPS |
| high | 865 FPS | 872 FPS |
| ultra | 782 FPS | 787 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 801 FPS | 731 FPS |
| medium | 709 FPS | 632 FPS |
| high | 666 FPS | 600 FPS |
| ultra | 597 FPS | 537 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 517 FPS | 468 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 269 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6248R | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 886 FPS | 877 FPS |
| medium | 886 FPS | 848 FPS |
| high | 841 FPS | 733 FPS |
| ultra | 713 FPS | 637 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 886 FPS | 736 FPS |
| medium | 776 FPS | 646 FPS |
| high | 654 FPS | 555 FPS |
| ultra | 551 FPS | 476 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 659 FPS | 531 FPS |
| medium | 574 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 495 FPS | 416 FPS |
| ultra | 414 FPS | 361 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6248R and Xeon Platinum 8268

Xeon Gold 6248R
Xeon Gold 6248R
The Xeon Gold 6248R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 35,434 points. Launch price was $2,700.

Xeon Platinum 8268
Xeon Platinum 8268
The Xeon Platinum 8268 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 35,081 points. Launch price was $6,302.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon Gold 6248R and Xeon Platinum 8268 share an identical 24-core/48-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6248R versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8268 — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6248R (base: 3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6248R uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8268 uses Cascade Lake-SP (2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6248R scores 35,434 against the Xeon Platinum 8268's 35,081 — a 1% lead for the Xeon Gold 6248R. L3 cache: 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6248R vs 35.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8268.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6248R | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+3% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+3% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 35.75 MB | 35.75 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+2300% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Cascade Lake-SP (2018) |
| PassMark | 35,434+1% | 35,081 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 24,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,394 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 12,046 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0. Maximum memory speed reaches 2933 on the Xeon Gold 6248R versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Platinum 8268 — the Xeon Gold 6248R supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 1024 of RAM. Both feature 6-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 48 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C621 (Xeon Gold 6248R) and C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Platinum 8268).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6248R | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2933+73225% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 | 1024 GB+104857500% |
| RAM Channels | 6 | 6 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | 48 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6248R) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Platinum 8268). Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8268 targets High-end Server. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6248R rivals EPYC 7402; Xeon Platinum 8268 rivals EPYC 7452.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6248R | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | High-end Server |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Gold 6248R launched at $2700 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8268 debuted at $6302. On MSRP ($2700 vs $6302), the Xeon Gold 6248R is $3602 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 6248R delivers 13.1 pts/$ vs 5.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8268 — making the Xeon Gold 6248R the 80.9% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6248R | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2700-57% | $6302 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.1+134% | 5.6 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













