EPYC 9135 vs Xeon Gold 6442Y

CPU

GPU

EPYC 9135

16 Cores32 Thrd200 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2024

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Xeon Gold 6442Y

24 Cores48 Thrd225 WWMax: 4 GHz2023

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

EPYC 9135

16 / 32

57,808

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon Gold 6442Y

24 / 48

58,534

+1.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 9135

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,664 less on MSRP ($1,214 MSRP vs $2,878 MSRP).
✅Delivers 134.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 47.6 vs 20.3 PassMark/$ ($1,214 MSRP vs $2,878 MSRP).
✅Draws 200W instead of 225W, a 25W reduction.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6442Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (57,808 vs 58,534).

Xeon Gold 6442Y

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.3 vs 47.6 PassMark/$ ($2,878 MSRP vs $1,214 MSRP).

EPYC 9135

2024

Xeon Gold 6442Y

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,664 less on MSRP ($1,214 MSRP vs $2,878 MSRP).
✅Delivers 134.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 47.6 vs 20.3 PassMark/$ ($1,214 MSRP vs $2,878 MSRP).
✅Draws 200W instead of 225W, a 25W reduction.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6442Y across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (57,808 vs 58,534).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.3 vs 47.6 PassMark/$ ($2,878 MSRP vs $1,214 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6442Y better than EPYC 9135?

Yes. Xeon Gold 6442Y is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 8.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.3% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Gold 6442Y is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 8.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6442Y is the better fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Gold 6442Y is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 9135 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon Gold 6442Y is 137.1% more expensive on MSRP at $2,878 MSRP versus $1,214 MSRP, and it gives you a 8.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 9135 is also 134.1% better value on MSRP (47.6 vs 20.3 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 9135 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

EPYC 9135 Benchmark Check

Xeon Gold 6442Y Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	EPYC 9135	Xeon Gold 6442Y
1080p
low	172 FPS	200 FPS
medium	139 FPS	165 FPS
high	119 FPS	137 FPS
ultra	96 FPS	107 FPS
1440p
low	152 FPS	159 FPS
medium	120 FPS	124 FPS
high	99 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	81 FPS	77 FPS
4K
low	81 FPS	73 FPS
medium	69 FPS	61 FPS
high	55 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	39 FPS

Open EPYC 9135 Open Xeon Gold 6442Y

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	EPYC 9135	Xeon Gold 6442Y
1080p
low	496 FPS	512 FPS
medium	439 FPS	443 FPS
high	341 FPS	354 FPS
ultra	293 FPS	294 FPS
1440p
low	427 FPS	431 FPS
medium	382 FPS	381 FPS
high	309 FPS	314 FPS
ultra	248 FPS	250 FPS
4K
low	267 FPS	268 FPS
medium	242 FPS	241 FPS
high	211 FPS	211 FPS
ultra	183 FPS	176 FPS

Open EPYC 9135 Open Xeon Gold 6442Y

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	EPYC 9135	Xeon Gold 6442Y
1080p
low	729 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	607 FPS	998 FPS
high	552 FPS	940 FPS
ultra	489 FPS	853 FPS
1440p
low	559 FPS	875 FPS
medium	463 FPS	775 FPS
high	415 FPS	718 FPS
ultra	362 FPS	645 FPS
4K
low	407 FPS	558 FPS
medium	325 FPS	458 FPS
high	287 FPS	396 FPS
ultra	232 FPS	325 FPS

Open EPYC 9135 Open Xeon Gold 6442Y

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	EPYC 9135	Xeon Gold 6442Y
1080p
low	929 FPS	985 FPS
medium	846 FPS	887 FPS
high	732 FPS	767 FPS
ultra	660 FPS	659 FPS
1440p
low	735 FPS	763 FPS
medium	652 FPS	669 FPS
high	561 FPS	575 FPS
ultra	493 FPS	495 FPS
4K
low	524 FPS	555 FPS
medium	475 FPS	495 FPS
high	417 FPS	435 FPS
ultra	365 FPS	372 FPS

Open EPYC 9135 Open Xeon Gold 6442Y

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9135 and Xeon Gold 6442Y

EPYC 9135

The EPYC 9135 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.65 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 57,808 points. Launch price was $1,214.

Xeon Gold 6442Y

The Xeon Gold 6442Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 58,534 points. Launch price was $2,065.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 9135 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6442Y offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6442Y has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the EPYC 9135 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6442Y — a 7.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 9135 (base: 3.65 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The EPYC 9135 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6442Y uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9135 scores 57,808 against the Xeon Gold 6442Y's 58,534 — a 1.2% lead for the Xeon Gold 6442Y. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 9135 vs 60 MB on the Xeon Gold 6442Y.

Feature	EPYC 9135	Xeon Gold 6442Y
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+7%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.65 GHz+40%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+7%	60 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm-43%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Turin (2024)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	57,808	58,534+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 9135 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6442Y uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6000 on the EPYC 9135 versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 6442Y — the EPYC 9135 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9135 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9135) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6442Y). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9135) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6442Y) — the EPYC 9135 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9135) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6442Y).

Feature	EPYC 9135	Xeon Gold 6442Y
Socket	SP5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	6000+25%	4800
Max RAM Capacity	6144+50%	4096
RAM Channels	12+50%	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	128+60%	80

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: EPYC 9135 rivals Xeon Platinum 8558P; Xeon Gold 6442Y rivals EPYC 9354.

Feature	EPYC 9135	Xeon Gold 6442Y
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The EPYC 9135 launched at $1214 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6442Y debuted at $2878. On MSRP ($1214 vs $2878), the EPYC 9135 is $1664 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9135 delivers 47.6 pts/$ vs 20.3 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6442Y — making the EPYC 9135 the 80.3% better value option.