
Xeon Gold 5512U
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6421N
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 5512U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+2.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $1,138 less on MSRP ($1,230 MSRP vs $2,368 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 97.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.1 vs 24.8 PassMark/$ ($1,230 MSRP vs $2,368 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6421N across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Xeon Gold 6421N
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (58,797 vs 60,367).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.8 vs 49.1 PassMark/$ ($2,368 MSRP vs $1,230 MSRP).
Xeon Gold 5512U
2023Xeon Gold 6421N
2023Why buy it
- ✅+2.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $1,138 less on MSRP ($1,230 MSRP vs $2,368 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 97.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.1 vs 24.8 PassMark/$ ($1,230 MSRP vs $2,368 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6421N across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (58,797 vs 60,367).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.8 vs 49.1 PassMark/$ ($2,368 MSRP vs $1,230 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 5512U better than Xeon Gold 6421N?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5512U | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5512U | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 241 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 83 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5512U | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 777 FPS | 956 FPS |
| medium | 691 FPS | 837 FPS |
| high | 657 FPS | 793 FPS |
| ultra | 581 FPS | 705 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 672 FPS | 774 FPS |
| medium | 594 FPS | 668 FPS |
| high | 562 FPS | 623 FPS |
| ultra | 503 FPS | 555 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 370 FPS | 391 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 279 FPS | 279 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5512U | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 940 FPS | 923 FPS |
| medium | 841 FPS | 832 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 717 FPS |
| ultra | 622 FPS | 619 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 762 FPS | 715 FPS |
| medium | 666 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 572 FPS | 538 FPS |
| ultra | 484 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 550 FPS | 516 FPS |
| medium | 493 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 404 FPS |
| ultra | 372 FPS | 349 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 5512U and Xeon Gold 6421N

Xeon Gold 5512U
Xeon Gold 5512U
The Xeon Gold 5512U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 60,367 points. Launch price was $1,230.

Xeon Gold 6421N
Xeon Gold 6421N
The Xeon Gold 6421N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 58,797 points. Launch price was $2,368.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 5512U packs 28 cores / 56 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6421N offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Gold 6421N has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5512U versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6421N — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5512U (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5512U uses the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6421N uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5512U scores 60,367 against the Xeon Gold 6421N's 58,797 — a 2.6% lead for the Xeon Gold 5512U. L3 cache: 52.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5512U vs 60 MB on the Xeon Gold 6421N.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5512U | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 28 / 56 | 32 / 64+14% |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+3% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz+17% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 52.5 MB (total) | 60 MB+14% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Emerald Rapids (2023) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 60,367+3% | 58,797 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA4677 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to 4800 memory speed. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 80 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon Gold 5512U) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6421N).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5512U | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4677 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 80 | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5512U rivals EPYC 9354; Xeon Gold 6421N rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5512U | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Gold 5512U launched at $1230 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6421N debuted at $2368. On MSRP ($1230 vs $2368), the Xeon Gold 5512U is $1138 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 5512U delivers 49.1 pts/$ vs 24.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6421N — making the Xeon Gold 5512U the 65.6% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5512U | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1230-48% | $2368 |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.1+98% | 24.8 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













