
Xeon Gold 6137
Popular choices:

Xeon W-2245
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 6137
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+51.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 17 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,365 vs 19,422).
- ❌32.3% higher power demand at 205W vs 155W.
Xeon W-2245
2019Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 155W instead of 205W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6137 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 25 MB).
Xeon Gold 6137
2017Xeon W-2245
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+51.5% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 17 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 155W instead of 205W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,365 vs 19,422).
- ❌32.3% higher power demand at 205W vs 155W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6137 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 25 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-2245 better than Xeon Gold 6137?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6137 | Xeon W-2245 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6137 | Xeon W-2245 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 460 FPS | 396 FPS |
| medium | 396 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 336 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 304 FPS | 254 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 408 FPS | 351 FPS |
| medium | 358 FPS | 300 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 267 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 235 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 215 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 191 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6137 | Xeon W-2245 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 484 FPS | 486 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 459 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 397 FPS | 486 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 350 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6137 | Xeon W-2245 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 484 FPS | 486 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 484 FPS | 486 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 484 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 457 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 409 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6137 and Xeon W-2245

Xeon Gold 6137
Xeon Gold 6137
The Xeon Gold 6137 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 19,365 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon W-2245
Xeon W-2245
The Xeon W-2245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 19,422 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon Gold 6137 and Xeon W-2245 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6137 versus 4.7 GHz on the Xeon W-2245 — a 13.6% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2245 (base: 3.9 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6137 scores 19,365 against the Xeon W-2245's 19,422 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon W-2245. L3 cache: 25 MB on the Xeon Gold 6137 vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon W-2245.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6137 | Xeon W-2245 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz | 4.7 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | 3.9 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB+52% | 16.5 MB |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| PassMark | 19,365 | 19,422 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 6137 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-2245 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6137 | Xeon W-2245 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













