Ryzen 7 5800HS vs Xeon Gold 6137

AMD

Ryzen 7 5800HS

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2021

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 6137

8 Cores16 Thrd205 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2017

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 5800HS

2021

Why buy it

  • Draws 35W instead of 205W, a 170W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).

Xeon Gold 6137

2017

Why buy it

  • +56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (19,365 vs 19,512).
  • 485.7% higher power demand at 205W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5800HS better than Xeon Gold 6137?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Gold 6137 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 5800HS is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 5800HS is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 1.6% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 5800HS is the better fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 5800HS still looks like the safer overall buy. Ryzen 7 5800HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 5800HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 7 5800HSXeon Gold 6137
1080p
low183 FPS186 FPS
medium150 FPS147 FPS
high121 FPS120 FPS
ultra99 FPS96 FPS
1440p
low155 FPS150 FPS
medium125 FPS116 FPS
high101 FPS93 FPS
ultra82 FPS74 FPS
4K
low87 FPS69 FPS
medium76 FPS57 FPS
high60 FPS45 FPS
ultra47 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 7 5800HSXeon Gold 6137
1080p
low488 FPS460 FPS
medium421 FPS396 FPS
high361 FPS336 FPS
ultra315 FPS304 FPS
1440p
low452 FPS408 FPS
medium381 FPS358 FPS
high331 FPS305 FPS
ultra279 FPS267 FPS
4K
low323 FPS267 FPS
medium280 FPS235 FPS
high256 FPS215 FPS
ultra221 FPS191 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 7 5800HSXeon Gold 6137
1080p
low488 FPS484 FPS
medium488 FPS484 FPS
high488 FPS484 FPS
ultra488 FPS484 FPS
1440p
low488 FPS484 FPS
medium488 FPS484 FPS
high486 FPS459 FPS
ultra430 FPS397 FPS
4K
low469 FPS441 FPS
medium397 FPS350 FPS
high349 FPS309 FPS
ultra284 FPS248 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 7 5800HSXeon Gold 6137
1080p
low488 FPS484 FPS
medium488 FPS484 FPS
high488 FPS484 FPS
ultra488 FPS484 FPS
1440p
low488 FPS484 FPS
medium488 FPS484 FPS
high488 FPS484 FPS
ultra440 FPS484 FPS
4K
low473 FPS484 FPS
medium422 FPS457 FPS
high370 FPS409 FPS
ultra315 FPS354 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5800HS and Xeon Gold 6137

AMD

Ryzen 7 5800HS

The Ryzen 7 5800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,512 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6137

The Xeon Gold 6137 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 19,365 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 7 5800HS and Xeon Gold 6137 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800HS versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6137 — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800HS (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5800HS is built on the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5800HS scores 19,512 against the Xeon Gold 6137's 19,365 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800HS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5800HS vs 25 MB on the Xeon Gold 6137.

FeatureRyzen 7 5800HSXeon Gold 6137
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz+7%
4.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
3.9 GHz+39%
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
25 MB+56%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
Process
7 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021)
PassMark
19,512
19,365
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 5800HS uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6137 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 7 5800HSXeon Gold 6137
Socket
FP6
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0