
Ryzen 7 5800HS
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5800HS
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌25% higher power demand at 35W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 35W, a 7W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,469 vs 19,512).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
Ryzen 7 5800HS
2021Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 8 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 35W, a 7W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of FP6 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌25% higher power demand at 35W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on FP6 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,469 vs 19,512).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 16 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800HS better than Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800HS | Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 85 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800HS | Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 361 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 315 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 452 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 331 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 279 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 83 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800HS | Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 403 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 486 FPS | 418 FPS |
| ultra | 430 FPS | 340 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 469 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 337 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 230 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5800HS | Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 487 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 487 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 473 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 370 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 315 FPS | 363 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5800HS and Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340


Ryzen 7 5800HS
Ryzen 7 5800HS
The Ryzen 7 5800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,512 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340
Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340
The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Krackan Point (2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 19,469 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5800HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 7 5800HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800HS versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5800HS uses the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 uses Krackan Point (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5800HS scores 19,512 against the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340's 19,469 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800HS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5800HS vs 8 MB on the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800HS | Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.8 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+40% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+100% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) | Krackan Point (2025) |
| PassMark | 19,512 | 19,469 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5800HS uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800HS | Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP6 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












