
Xeon Gold 6130T
Popular choices:

Xeon W-11955M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 6130T
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-11955M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
Xeon W-11955M
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,702 vs 21,804).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $623 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6130T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6130T
2017Xeon W-11955M
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-11955M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,702 vs 21,804).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $623 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6130T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-11955M better than Xeon Gold 6130T?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6130T | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6130T | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 293 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 225 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 134 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6130T | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 545 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 507 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 453 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 426 FPS |
| ultra | 355 FPS | 345 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 315 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 259 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6130T | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 545 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 545 FPS | 543 FPS |
| ultra | 545 FPS | 543 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 545 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 545 FPS | 543 FPS |
| ultra | 468 FPS | 476 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 500 FPS | 510 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 400 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 345 FPS | 348 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6130T and Xeon W-11955M

Xeon Gold 6130T
Xeon Gold 6130T
The Xeon Gold 6130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 21,804 points. Launch price was $1,988.

Xeon W-11955M
Xeon W-11955M
The Xeon W-11955M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,702 points. Launch price was $623.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 6130T packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon W-11955M offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Gold 6130T has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6130T versus 5 GHz on the Xeon W-11955M — a 29.9% clock advantage for the Xeon W-11955M (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6130T uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-11955M uses Tiger Lake-H (2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6130T scores 21,804 against the Xeon W-11955M's 21,702 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 6130T. L3 cache: 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6130T vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon W-11955M.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6130T | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz | 5 GHz+35% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 22 MB | 24 MB (total)+9% |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+1180% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm SuperFin-29% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Tiger Lake-H (2021) |
| PassMark | 21,804 | 21,702 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 6130T uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-11955M uses FCBGA1787 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6130T | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | FCBGA1787 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













