
Xeon Gold 6130T
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4310
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 6130T
2017Why buy it
- ✅+22.2% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 18 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4310 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,804 vs 21,903).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Silver 4310
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 125W, a 5W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 22 MB).
Xeon Gold 6130T
2017Xeon Silver 4310
2021Why buy it
- ✅+22.2% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 18 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 125W, a 5W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Silver 4310 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,804 vs 21,903).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 22 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Silver 4310 better than Xeon Gold 6130T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6130T | Xeon Silver 4310 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6130T | Xeon Silver 4310 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 76 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6130T | Xeon Silver 4310 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 548 FPS |
| medium | 545 FPS | 548 FPS |
| high | 507 FPS | 548 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 548 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 548 FPS |
| medium | 453 FPS | 548 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 548 FPS |
| ultra | 355 FPS | 525 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 315 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 267 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 6130T | Xeon Silver 4310 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 548 FPS |
| medium | 545 FPS | 548 FPS |
| high | 545 FPS | 548 FPS |
| ultra | 545 FPS | 548 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 548 FPS |
| medium | 545 FPS | 548 FPS |
| high | 545 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 468 FPS | 425 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 500 FPS | 453 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 400 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 345 FPS | 317 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 6130T and Xeon Silver 4310

Xeon Gold 6130T
Xeon Gold 6130T
The Xeon Gold 6130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 21,804 points. Launch price was $1,988.

Xeon Silver 4310
Xeon Silver 4310
The Xeon Silver 4310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 21,903 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 6130T packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4310 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Gold 6130T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6130T versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4310 — a 11.4% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6130T (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon Gold 6130T uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4310 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 6130T scores 21,804 against the Xeon Silver 4310's 21,903 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon Silver 4310. L3 cache: 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6130T vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4310.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6130T | Xeon Silver 4310 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+33% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+12% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 22 MB+22% | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+1500% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 21,804 | 21,903 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 6130T uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4310 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6130T | Xeon Silver 4310 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 2667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 6144 |
| RAM Channels | — | 8 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 64 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon Gold 6130T) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Silver 4310).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 6130T | Xeon Silver 4310 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













