
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6130T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +36.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 22 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6130T, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6130T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6130T
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,804 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon Gold 6130T
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +36.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 22 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6130T, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6130T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,804 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon Gold 6130T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6130T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6130T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 81 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6130T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 545 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 507 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 453 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 355 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 225 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6130T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 545 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 545 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 545 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 468 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 500 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 400 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 345 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon Gold 6130T


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon Gold 6130T
Xeon Gold 6130T
The Xeon Gold 6130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 21,804 points. Launch price was $1,988.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6130T offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6130T has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6130T — a 17.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6130T uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon Gold 6130T's 21,804 — a 2.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6130T.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6130T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+19% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+71% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+45% | 22 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 16 MB+3100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 22,430+3% | 21,804 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6130T uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6130T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











