
Xeon Gold 5520+
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8454H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 5520+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,457 less on MSRP ($1,083 MSRP vs $6,540 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 493.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 56.5 vs 9.5 PassMark/$ ($1,083 MSRP vs $6,540 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 205W instead of 270W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8454H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (61,227 vs 62,347).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (53 MB vs 83 MB).
Xeon Platinum 8454H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+57.1% larger total L3 cache (83 MB vs 53 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.5 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($6,540 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
- ❌31.7% higher power demand at 270W vs 205W.
Xeon Gold 5520+
2023Xeon Platinum 8454H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,457 less on MSRP ($1,083 MSRP vs $6,540 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 493.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 56.5 vs 9.5 PassMark/$ ($1,083 MSRP vs $6,540 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 205W instead of 270W, a 65W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+57.1% larger total L3 cache (83 MB vs 53 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8454H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (61,227 vs 62,347).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (53 MB vs 83 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.5 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($6,540 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
- ❌31.7% higher power demand at 270W vs 205W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Platinum 8454H better than Xeon Gold 5520+?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5520+ | Xeon Platinum 8454H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5520+ | Xeon Platinum 8454H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 83 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5520+ | Xeon Platinum 8454H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 875 FPS | 811 FPS |
| medium | 792 FPS | 735 FPS |
| high | 748 FPS | 700 FPS |
| ultra | 658 FPS | 624 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 749 FPS | 724 FPS |
| medium | 674 FPS | 651 FPS |
| high | 633 FPS | 608 FPS |
| ultra | 564 FPS | 547 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 294 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5520+ | Xeon Platinum 8454H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 935 FPS | 1084 FPS |
| medium | 842 FPS | 965 FPS |
| high | 728 FPS | 823 FPS |
| ultra | 632 FPS | 679 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 768 FPS | 891 FPS |
| medium | 674 FPS | 765 FPS |
| high | 579 FPS | 650 FPS |
| ultra | 498 FPS | 536 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 504 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 445 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 415 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 5520+ and Xeon Platinum 8454H

Xeon Gold 5520+
Xeon Gold 5520+
The Xeon Gold 5520+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 61,227 points. Launch price was $1,640.

Xeon Platinum 8454H
Xeon Platinum 8454H
The Xeon Platinum 8454H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 82.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 62,347 points. Launch price was $6,540.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 5520+ packs 28 cores / 56 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8454H offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8454H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5520+ versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8454H — a 16.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5520+ (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5520+ uses the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8454H uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5520+ scores 61,227 against the Xeon Platinum 8454H's 62,347 — a 1.8% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8454H. L3 cache: 52.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5520+ vs 82.5 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8454H.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5520+ | Xeon Platinum 8454H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 28 / 56 | 32 / 64+14% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+18% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz+5% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 52.5 MB (total) | 82.5 MB+57% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | Intel 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Emerald Rapids (2023) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 61,227 | 62,347+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,600 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 25,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA4677 socket with PCIe 4.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Xeon Gold 5520+ versus 4800 on the Xeon Platinum 8454H — the Xeon Platinum 8454H supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 GB of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 80 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon Gold 5520+) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8454H).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5520+ | Xeon Platinum 8454H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4677 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | 4800+95900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB+104857500% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 80 | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Gold 5520+ targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5520+ rivals EPYC 9354; Xeon Platinum 8454H rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5520+ | Xeon Platinum 8454H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Enterprise Server | — |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Gold 5520+ launched at $1083 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8454H debuted at $6540. On MSRP ($1083 vs $6540), the Xeon Gold 5520+ is $5457 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 5520+ delivers 56.5 pts/$ vs 9.5 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8454H — making the Xeon Gold 5520+ the 142.3% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5520+ | Xeon Platinum 8454H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1083-83% | $6540 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.5+495% | 9.5 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













