
Xeon Gold 5520+
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8380
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 5520+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $927 less on MSRP ($1,083 MSRP vs $2,010 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 82.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 56.5 vs 31.0 PassMark/$ ($1,083 MSRP vs $2,010 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 205W instead of 270W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8380 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (25,000 vs 40,000).
Xeon Platinum 8380
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($2,010 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
- ❌31.7% higher power demand at 270W vs 205W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 5520+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Gold 5520+
2023Xeon Platinum 8380
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $927 less on MSRP ($1,083 MSRP vs $2,010 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 82.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 56.5 vs 31.0 PassMark/$ ($1,083 MSRP vs $2,010 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 205W instead of 270W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8380 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (25,000 vs 40,000).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($2,010 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
- ❌31.7% higher power demand at 270W vs 205W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 5520+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Platinum 8380 better than Xeon Gold 5520+?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5520+ | Xeon Platinum 8380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5520+ | Xeon Platinum 8380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 412 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 235 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 135 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5520+ | Xeon Platinum 8380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 875 FPS | 935 FPS |
| medium | 792 FPS | 817 FPS |
| high | 748 FPS | 766 FPS |
| ultra | 658 FPS | 680 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 749 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 674 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 633 FPS | 603 FPS |
| ultra | 564 FPS | 535 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 506 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 316 FPS | 272 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5520+ | Xeon Platinum 8380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 935 FPS | 900 FPS |
| medium | 842 FPS | 817 FPS |
| high | 728 FPS | 705 FPS |
| ultra | 632 FPS | 606 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 768 FPS | 703 FPS |
| medium | 674 FPS | 617 FPS |
| high | 579 FPS | 530 FPS |
| ultra | 498 FPS | 454 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 504 FPS | 454 FPS |
| high | 445 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 346 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 5520+ and Xeon Platinum 8380

Xeon Gold 5520+
Xeon Gold 5520+
The Xeon Gold 5520+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 61,227 points. Launch price was $1,640.

Xeon Platinum 8380
Xeon Platinum 8380
The Xeon Platinum 8380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 40 cores and 80 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,318 points. Launch price was $5,846.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 5520+ packs 28 cores / 56 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8380 offers 40 cores / 80 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8380 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5520+ versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8380 — a 16.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5520+ (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5520+ uses the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8380 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5520+ scores 61,227 against the Xeon Platinum 8380's 62,318 — a 1.8% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8380. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,600 vs 1,300, a 20.7% lead for the Xeon Gold 5520+ that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 25,000 vs 40,000 (46.2% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8380). L3 cache: 52.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5520+ vs 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8380.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5520+ | Xeon Platinum 8380 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 28 / 56 | 40 / 80+43% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+18% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.3 GHz+5% |
| L3 Cache | 52.5 MB (total) | 60 MB (total)+14% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Emerald Rapids (2023) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 61,227 | 62,318+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,600+23% | 1,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 25,000 | 40,000+60% |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 5520+ uses the LGA4677 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8380 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Xeon Gold 5520+ versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8380 — the Xeon Gold 5520+ supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8380 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 80 (Xeon Gold 5520+) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8380) — the Xeon Gold 5520+ offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon Gold 5520+) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8380).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5520+ | Xeon Platinum 8380 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4677 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 GB | 6144 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 80+25% | 64 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon Gold 5520+ targets Enterprise Server, Xeon Platinum 8380 targets Datacenter. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5520+ rivals EPYC 9354; Xeon Platinum 8380 rivals EPYC 7543.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5520+ | Xeon Platinum 8380 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Enterprise Server | Datacenter |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Gold 5520+ launched at $1083 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8380 debuted at $2010. On MSRP ($1083 vs $2010), the Xeon Gold 5520+ is $927 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 5520+ delivers 56.5 pts/$ vs 31.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8380 — making the Xeon Gold 5520+ the 58.3% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5520+ | Xeon Platinum 8380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1083-46% | $2010 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.5+82% | 31.0 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













