
Xeon Gold 5315Y
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6334
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 5315Y
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 165W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6334 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,477 vs 20,512).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 18 MB).
Xeon Gold 6334
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌17.9% higher power demand at 165W vs 140W.
Xeon Gold 5315Y
2021Xeon Gold 6334
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 165W, a 25W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6334 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,477 vs 20,512).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 18 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌17.9% higher power demand at 165W vs 140W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6334 better than Xeon Gold 5315Y?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5315Y | Xeon Gold 6334 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5315Y | Xeon Gold 6334 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 212 FPS | 385 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 313 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 264 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 283 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 162 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5315Y | Xeon Gold 6334 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 512 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 512 FPS | 513 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 513 FPS |
| ultra | 512 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 512 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 512 FPS | 513 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 513 FPS |
| ultra | 512 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 481 FPS | 494 FPS |
| medium | 378 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 334 FPS | 345 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 281 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5315Y | Xeon Gold 6334 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 512 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 512 FPS | 513 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 513 FPS |
| ultra | 512 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 512 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 512 FPS | 513 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 513 FPS |
| ultra | 453 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 513 FPS |
| high | 384 FPS | 468 FPS |
| ultra | 334 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 5315Y and Xeon Gold 6334

Xeon Gold 5315Y
Xeon Gold 5315Y
The Xeon Gold 5315Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 20,477 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Gold 6334
Xeon Gold 6334
The Xeon Gold 6334 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 20,512 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon Gold 5315Y and Xeon Gold 6334 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5315Y versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6334 — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6334 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). Both are built on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture using a 10 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5315Y scores 20,477 against the Xeon Gold 6334's 20,512 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon Gold 6334. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5315Y vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6334.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5315Y | Xeon Gold 6334 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 18 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Ice Lake-SP (2021) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 20,477 | 20,512 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA4189 socket with PCIe 4.0.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5315Y | Xeon Gold 6334 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4189 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 6144 |
| RAM Channels | — | 8 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 64 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon Gold 5315Y) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6334). Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6334 rivals EPYC 72F3.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5315Y | Xeon Gold 6334 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













