
Xeon Gold 5315Y
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6250
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 5315Y
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 185W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6250 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,477 vs 20,552).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 36 MB).
Xeon Gold 6250
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.8% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+197.9% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $3,400 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5315Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌32.1% higher power demand at 185W vs 140W.
Xeon Gold 5315Y
2021Xeon Gold 6250
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 185W, a 45W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.8% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+197.9% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6250 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,477 vs 20,552).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 36 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $3,400 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5315Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌32.1% higher power demand at 185W vs 140W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6250 better than Xeon Gold 5315Y?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5315Y | Xeon Gold 6250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5315Y | Xeon Gold 6250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 514 FPS |
| medium | 212 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 417 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 368 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 303 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 263 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 241 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 211 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5315Y | Xeon Gold 6250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 512 FPS | 514 FPS |
| medium | 512 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 512 FPS | 514 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 512 FPS | 514 FPS |
| medium | 512 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 512 FPS | 514 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 481 FPS | 514 FPS |
| medium | 378 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 334 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 317 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5315Y | Xeon Gold 6250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 512 FPS | 514 FPS |
| medium | 512 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 512 FPS | 514 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 512 FPS | 514 FPS |
| medium | 512 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 453 FPS | 514 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 514 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 384 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 334 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 5315Y and Xeon Gold 6250

Xeon Gold 5315Y
Xeon Gold 5315Y
The Xeon Gold 5315Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 20,477 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Gold 6250
Xeon Gold 6250
The Xeon Gold 6250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 20,552 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon Gold 5315Y and Xeon Gold 6250 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5315Y versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6250 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6250 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5315Y is built on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5315Y scores 20,477 against the Xeon Gold 6250's 20,552 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon Gold 6250. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5315Y vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6250.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5315Y | Xeon Gold 6250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4.5 GHz+25% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.9 GHz+22% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 35.75 MB+198% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Ice Lake-SP (2021) | — |
| PassMark | 20,477 | 20,552 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 5315Y uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6250 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5315Y | Xeon Gold 6250 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4189 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













