Xeon Gold 5315Y vs Xeon Gold 6138T

Intel

Xeon Gold 5315Y

8 Cores16 Thrd140 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2021

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 6138T

20 Cores40 Thrd125 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Xeon Gold 5315Y

2021

Why buy it

  • +0.6% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 28 MB).
  • No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Gold 6138T

2017

Why buy it

  • +129.2% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Draws 125W instead of 140W, a 15W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (20,356 vs 20,477).
  • Launch MSRP is still $2,742 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5315Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Gold 6138T better than Xeon Gold 5315Y?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Xeon Gold 6138T is ahead with a 2.9% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5315Y pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark. Xeon Gold 6138T also has the bigger cache pool with 129.2% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5315Y is the better fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon Gold 6138T is the smarter buy today. Xeon Gold 6138T is at an unclear MSRP at $2,742 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon Gold 5315Y is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 5315Y is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 20/40. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetXeon Gold 5315YXeon Gold 6138T
1080p
low174 FPS189 FPS
medium138 FPS153 FPS
high114 FPS123 FPS
ultra90 FPS96 FPS
1440p
low145 FPS149 FPS
medium113 FPS117 FPS
high91 FPS93 FPS
ultra72 FPS73 FPS
4K
low67 FPS69 FPS
medium56 FPS58 FPS
high44 FPS46 FPS
ultra35 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetXeon Gold 5315YXeon Gold 6138T
1080p
low245 FPS213 FPS
medium212 FPS188 FPS
high191 FPS161 FPS
ultra152 FPS136 FPS
1440p
low217 FPS184 FPS
medium193 FPS166 FPS
high176 FPS143 FPS
ultra140 FPS120 FPS
4K
low176 FPS120 FPS
medium161 FPS109 FPS
high138 FPS99 FPS
ultra108 FPS82 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetXeon Gold 5315YXeon Gold 6138T
1080p
low512 FPS509 FPS
medium512 FPS509 FPS
high512 FPS495 FPS
ultra512 FPS429 FPS
1440p
low512 FPS509 FPS
medium512 FPS449 FPS
high512 FPS408 FPS
ultra512 FPS354 FPS
4K
low481 FPS399 FPS
medium378 FPS314 FPS
high334 FPS281 FPS
ultra272 FPS226 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetXeon Gold 5315YXeon Gold 6138T
1080p
low512 FPS509 FPS
medium512 FPS509 FPS
high512 FPS509 FPS
ultra512 FPS509 FPS
1440p
low512 FPS509 FPS
medium512 FPS509 FPS
high512 FPS509 FPS
ultra453 FPS463 FPS
4K
low478 FPS496 FPS
medium428 FPS445 FPS
high384 FPS396 FPS
ultra334 FPS340 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 5315Y and Xeon Gold 6138T

Intel

Xeon Gold 5315Y

The Xeon Gold 5315Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 20,477 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6138T

The Xeon Gold 6138T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 20,356 points. Launch price was $2,742.

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 5315Y packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6138T offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6138T has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5315Y versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6138T — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6138T (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5315Y uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6138T uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5315Y scores 20,477 against the Xeon Gold 6138T's 20,356 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon Gold 5315Y. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5315Y vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6138T.

FeatureXeon Gold 5315YXeon Gold 6138T
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
20 / 40+150%
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz+3%
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+60%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
27.5 MB+129%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
20 MB+1900%
Process
10 nm-29%
14 nm
Architecture
Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark
20,477
20,356
Geekbench 6 Single
1,030
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,988
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Gold 5315Y uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6138T uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon Gold 5315YXeon Gold 6138T
Socket
LGA4189
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
768 GB
RAM Channels
6
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
48
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon Gold 5315Y) / Yes (Xeon Gold 6138T).

FeatureXeon Gold 5315YXeon Gold 6138T
Integrated GPU
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
Yes