
Xeon Gold 5315Y
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6138T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 5315Y
2021Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 28 MB).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 6138T
2017Why buy it
- ✅+129.2% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 140W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,356 vs 20,477).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $2,742 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5315Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 5315Y
2021Xeon Gold 6138T
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
Why buy it
- ✅+129.2% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 140W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 28 MB).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,356 vs 20,477).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $2,742 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5315Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6138T better than Xeon Gold 5315Y?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5315Y | Xeon Gold 6138T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5315Y | Xeon Gold 6138T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 212 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 82 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5315Y | Xeon Gold 6138T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 512 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 512 FPS | 509 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 512 FPS | 429 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 512 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 512 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 512 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 481 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 378 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 334 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5315Y | Xeon Gold 6138T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 512 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 512 FPS | 509 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 512 FPS | 509 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 512 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 512 FPS | 509 FPS |
| high | 512 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 453 FPS | 463 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 496 FPS |
| medium | 428 FPS | 445 FPS |
| high | 384 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 334 FPS | 340 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 5315Y and Xeon Gold 6138T

Xeon Gold 5315Y
Xeon Gold 5315Y
The Xeon Gold 5315Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 20,477 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon Gold 6138T
Xeon Gold 6138T
The Xeon Gold 6138T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 20,356 points. Launch price was $2,742.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 5315Y packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6138T offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6138T has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5315Y versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6138T — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6138T (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5315Y uses the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6138T uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5315Y scores 20,477 against the Xeon Gold 6138T's 20,356 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon Gold 5315Y. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5315Y vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6138T.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5315Y | Xeon Gold 6138T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 20 / 40+150% |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz+3% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+60% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 27.5 MB+129% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 20 MB+1900% |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Ice Lake-SP (2021) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 20,477 | 20,356 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,030 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,988 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 5315Y uses the LGA4189 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6138T uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5315Y | Xeon Gold 6138T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4189 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 768 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 6 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 48 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon Gold 5315Y) / Yes (Xeon Gold 6138T).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5315Y | Xeon Gold 6138T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













