
Xeon Gold 5218T
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6130
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 5218T
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 125W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6130 across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,433 vs 21,500).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,572 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6130 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 6130
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌19% higher power demand at 125W vs 105W.
Xeon Gold 5218T
2019Xeon Gold 6130
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 125W, a 20W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6130 across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,433 vs 21,500).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,572 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6130 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌19% higher power demand at 125W vs 105W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6130 better than Xeon Gold 5218T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5218T | Xeon Gold 6130 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5218T | Xeon Gold 6130 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 81 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5218T | Xeon Gold 6130 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 538 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 538 FPS |
| high | 495 FPS | 538 FPS |
| ultra | 429 FPS | 538 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 538 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 538 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 538 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 399 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 259 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5218T | Xeon Gold 6130 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 538 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 538 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 538 FPS |
| ultra | 536 FPS | 538 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 538 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 538 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 468 FPS | 433 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 500 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 400 FPS | 369 FPS |
| ultra | 345 FPS | 320 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 5218T and Xeon Gold 6130

Xeon Gold 5218T
Xeon Gold 5218T
The Xeon Gold 5218T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 21,433 points. Launch price was $1,561.

Xeon Gold 6130
Xeon Gold 6130
The Xeon Gold 6130 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 21,500 points. Launch price was $1,894.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon Gold 5218T and Xeon Gold 6130 share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5218T versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6130 — a 2.7% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5218T (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5218T uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6130 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5218T scores 21,433 against the Xeon Gold 6130's 21,500 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon Gold 6130. Both processors carry 22 MB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5218T | Xeon Gold 6130 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+3% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 22 MB | 22 MB |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB | 16 MB |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 21,433 | 21,500 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,029 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 7,545 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5218T | Xeon Gold 6130 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 768 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 6 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 48 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon Gold 5218T) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6130). Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6130 targets Server / Enterprise computing. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6130 rivals EPYC 7301.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5218T | Xeon Gold 6130 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Server / Enterprise computing |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













