
Xeon Gold 5218
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5218T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 5218
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $299 less on MSRP ($1,273 MSRP vs $1,572 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 24.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.0 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($1,273 MSRP vs $1,572 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌19% higher power demand at 125W vs 105W.
Xeon Gold 5218T
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 125W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5218 across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,433 vs 21,586).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 17.0 PassMark/$ ($1,572 MSRP vs $1,273 MSRP).
Xeon Gold 5218
2019Xeon Gold 5218T
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.4% higher average FPS across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $299 less on MSRP ($1,273 MSRP vs $1,572 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 24.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.0 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($1,273 MSRP vs $1,572 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 125W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌19% higher power demand at 125W vs 105W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 5218 across 37 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,433 vs 21,586).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 17.0 PassMark/$ ($1,572 MSRP vs $1,273 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 5218 better than Xeon Gold 5218T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5218 | Xeon Gold 5218T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5218 | Xeon Gold 5218T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 395 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 342 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 342 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 252 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 210 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 81 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5218 | Xeon Gold 5218T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 540 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 540 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 540 FPS | 429 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 540 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 540 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 506 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 455 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 357 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5218 | Xeon Gold 5218T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 540 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 540 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 540 FPS | 536 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 540 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 468 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 462 FPS | 500 FPS |
| medium | 416 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 372 FPS | 400 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 345 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 5218 and Xeon Gold 5218T

Xeon Gold 5218
Xeon Gold 5218
The Xeon Gold 5218 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 21,586 points. Launch price was $1,273.

Xeon Gold 5218T
Xeon Gold 5218T
The Xeon Gold 5218T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 21,433 points. Launch price was $1,561.
Processing Power
Both the Xeon Gold 5218 and Xeon Gold 5218T share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5218 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5218T — a 2.6% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5218 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). Both are built on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5218 scores 21,586 against the Xeon Gold 5218T's 21,433 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon Gold 5218. Both processors carry 22 MB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5218 | Xeon Gold 5218T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz+3% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz+10% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 22 MB | 22 MB |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB | 16 MB |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 21,586 | 21,433 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5218 | Xeon Gold 5218T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 768 | — |
| RAM Channels | 6 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5218) / not specified (Xeon Gold 5218T).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5218 | Xeon Gold 5218T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Gold 5218 launched at $1273 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 5218T debuted at $1572. On MSRP ($1273 vs $1572), the Xeon Gold 5218 is $299 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 5218 delivers 17.0 pts/$ vs 13.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5218T — making the Xeon Gold 5218 the 21.7% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5218 | Xeon Gold 5218T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1273-19% | $1572 |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.0+25% | 13.6 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













