
Xeon Gold 5218
Popular choices:

Xeon W-11955M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 5218
2019Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-11955M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,586 vs 21,702).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.0 vs 34.8 PassMark/$ ($1,273 MSRP vs $623 MSRP).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
Xeon W-11955M
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $650 less on MSRP ($623 MSRP vs $1,273 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 105.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.8 vs 17.0 PassMark/$ ($623 MSRP vs $1,273 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 5218
2019Xeon W-11955M
2021Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $650 less on MSRP ($623 MSRP vs $1,273 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 105.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.8 vs 17.0 PassMark/$ ($623 MSRP vs $1,273 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-11955M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,586 vs 21,702).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.0 vs 34.8 PassMark/$ ($1,273 MSRP vs $623 MSRP).
- ❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-11955M better than Xeon Gold 5218?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5218 | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5218 | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 395 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 342 FPS | 293 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 225 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 342 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 252 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 210 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 134 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5218 | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 540 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 540 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 540 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 540 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 540 FPS | 426 FPS |
| ultra | 506 FPS | 345 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 455 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 357 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 259 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5218 | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 540 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 540 FPS | 543 FPS |
| ultra | 540 FPS | 543 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 540 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 540 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 543 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 476 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 462 FPS | 510 FPS |
| medium | 416 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 372 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 348 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 5218 and Xeon W-11955M

Xeon Gold 5218
Xeon Gold 5218
The Xeon Gold 5218 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 21,586 points. Launch price was $1,273.

Xeon W-11955M
Xeon W-11955M
The Xeon W-11955M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,702 points. Launch price was $623.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 5218 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon W-11955M offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Gold 5218 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5218 versus 5 GHz on the Xeon W-11955M — a 24.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W-11955M (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5218 uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-11955M uses Tiger Lake-H (2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5218 scores 21,586 against the Xeon W-11955M's 21,702 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon W-11955M. L3 cache: 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 5218 vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon W-11955M.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5218 | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 5 GHz+28% |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz+10% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 22 MB | 24 MB (total)+9% |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+1180% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm SuperFin-29% |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Tiger Lake-H (2021) |
| PassMark | 21,586 | 21,702 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 5218 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-11955M uses FCBGA1787 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5218 | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | FCBGA1787 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | 2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 768 | — |
| RAM Channels | 6 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5218) / not specified (Xeon W-11955M).
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5218 | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Value Analysis
The Xeon Gold 5218 launched at $1273 MSRP, while the Xeon W-11955M debuted at $623. On MSRP ($1273 vs $623), the Xeon W-11955M is $650 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 5218 delivers 17.0 pts/$ vs 34.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W-11955M — making the Xeon W-11955M the 69% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5218 | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1273 | $623-51% |
| Performance per Dollar | 17.0 | 34.8+105% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













