Xeon Gold 5218 vs Xeon W-11955M

Intel

Xeon Gold 5218

16 Cores32 Thrd125 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2019

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon W-11955M

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 5 GHz2021

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Xeon Gold 5218

2019

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-11955M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (21,586 vs 21,702).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.0 vs 34.8 PassMark/$ ($1,273 MSRP vs $623 MSRP).
  • 257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.

Xeon W-11955M

2021

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $650 less on MSRP ($623 MSRP vs $1,273 MSRP).
  • Delivers 105.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 34.8 vs 17.0 PassMark/$ ($623 MSRP vs $1,273 MSRP).
  • Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-11955M better than Xeon Gold 5218?
Yes. Xeon W-11955M is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 8.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-11955M is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 8.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-11955M is the better fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Xeon W-11955M is the smarter buy today. Xeon W-11955M is $650 cheaper on MSRP at $623 MSRP versus $1,273 MSRP, and it gives you a 8.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 105.4% better value on MSRP (34.8 vs 17.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon W-11955M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetXeon Gold 5218Xeon W-11955M
1080p
low182 FPS247 FPS
medium147 FPS230 FPS
high119 FPS193 FPS
ultra93 FPS166 FPS
1440p
low144 FPS220 FPS
medium114 FPS185 FPS
high92 FPS150 FPS
ultra72 FPS133 FPS
4K
low67 FPS154 FPS
medium56 FPS131 FPS
high45 FPS101 FPS
ultra35 FPS89 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetXeon Gold 5218Xeon W-11955M
1080p
low395 FPS343 FPS
medium342 FPS293 FPS
high284 FPS248 FPS
ultra238 FPS225 FPS
1440p
low342 FPS298 FPS
medium303 FPS266 FPS
high252 FPS227 FPS
ultra210 FPS194 FPS
4K
low221 FPS177 FPS
medium197 FPS161 FPS
high174 FPS154 FPS
ultra143 FPS134 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetXeon Gold 5218Xeon W-11955M
1080p
low540 FPS543 FPS
medium540 FPS543 FPS
high540 FPS488 FPS
ultra540 FPS388 FPS
1440p
low540 FPS543 FPS
medium540 FPS501 FPS
high540 FPS426 FPS
ultra506 FPS345 FPS
4K
low455 FPS428 FPS
medium357 FPS368 FPS
high318 FPS324 FPS
ultra259 FPS259 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetXeon Gold 5218Xeon W-11955M
1080p
low540 FPS543 FPS
medium540 FPS543 FPS
high540 FPS543 FPS
ultra540 FPS543 FPS
1440p
low540 FPS543 FPS
medium540 FPS543 FPS
high509 FPS543 FPS
ultra436 FPS476 FPS
4K
low462 FPS510 FPS
medium416 FPS458 FPS
high372 FPS405 FPS
ultra323 FPS348 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 5218 and Xeon W-11955M

Intel

Xeon Gold 5218

The Xeon Gold 5218 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 21,586 points. Launch price was $1,273.

Intel

Xeon W-11955M

The Xeon W-11955M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,702 points. Launch price was $623.

Processing Power

The Xeon Gold 5218 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon W-11955M offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Gold 5218 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5218 versus 5 GHz on the Xeon W-11955M — a 24.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W-11955M (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5218 uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-11955M uses Tiger Lake-H (2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5218 scores 21,586 against the Xeon W-11955M's 21,702 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon W-11955M. L3 cache: 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 5218 vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon W-11955M.

FeatureXeon Gold 5218Xeon W-11955M
Cores / Threads
16 / 32+100%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz
5 GHz+28%
Base Clock
2.3 GHz+10%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
22 MB
24 MB (total)+9%
L2 Cache
16 MB+1180%
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
14 nm
10 nm SuperFin-29%
Architecture
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Tiger Lake-H (2021)
PassMark
21,586
21,702
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon Gold 5218 uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-11955M uses FCBGA1787 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon Gold 5218Xeon W-11955M
Socket
LGA3647
FCBGA1787
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
2666
Max RAM Capacity
768
RAM Channels
6
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
48
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5218) / not specified (Xeon W-11955M).

FeatureXeon Gold 5218Xeon W-11955M
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon Gold 5218 launched at $1273 MSRP, while the Xeon W-11955M debuted at $623. On MSRP ($1273 vs $623), the Xeon W-11955M is $650 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon Gold 5218 delivers 17.0 pts/$ vs 34.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W-11955M — making the Xeon W-11955M the 69% better value option.

FeatureXeon Gold 5218Xeon W-11955M
MSRP
$1273
$623-51%
Performance per Dollar
17.0
34.8+105%
Release Date
2019
2021