
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5218T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +37.9% higher average FPS across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 22 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,243 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,572 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 400.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,572 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5218T, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
Xeon Gold 5218T
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,433 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($1,572 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon Gold 5218T
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +37.9% higher average FPS across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 22 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,243 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,572 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 400.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,572 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5218T, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,433 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($1,572 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon Gold 5218T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 5218T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 5218T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 81 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 5218T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 429 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 281 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 5218T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 536 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 536 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 468 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 500 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 400 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 345 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon Gold 5218T


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon Gold 5218T
Xeon Gold 5218T
The Xeon Gold 5218T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 21,433 points. Launch price was $1,561.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5218T offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 5218T has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5218T — a 14.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5218T uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon Gold 5218T's 21,433 — a 4.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 5218T.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 5218T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+16% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+71% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+45% | 22 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 16 MB+3100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 22,430+5% | 21,433 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5218T uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 5218T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 5218T debuted at $1572. On MSRP ($329 vs $1572), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $1243 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 13.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5218T — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 133.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 5218T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-79% | $1572 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+401% | 13.6 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











