
Xeon Gold 5218R
Popular choices:

Xeon W-1390P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 5218R
2020Why buy it
- ✅+71.9% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-1390P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,000 vs 25,016).
Xeon W-1390P
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 28 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $594 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5218R mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 5218R
2020Xeon W-1390P
2021Why buy it
- ✅+71.9% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-1390P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,000 vs 25,016).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 28 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $594 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5218R mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-1390P better than Xeon Gold 5218R?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5218R | Xeon W-1390P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5218R | Xeon W-1390P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 353 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 314 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 283 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 287 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 249 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 249 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 223 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 184 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5218R | Xeon W-1390P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 625 FPS | 625 FPS |
| medium | 625 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 625 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 625 FPS | 398 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 625 FPS | 598 FPS |
| medium | 625 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 625 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 559 FPS | 366 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 487 FPS | 427 FPS |
| medium | 399 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 280 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5218R | Xeon W-1390P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 625 FPS | 625 FPS |
| medium | 625 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 625 FPS | 625 FPS |
| ultra | 567 FPS | 625 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 625 FPS | 625 FPS |
| medium | 590 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 625 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 625 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 468 FPS | 625 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 576 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 515 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 5218R and Xeon W-1390P

Xeon Gold 5218R
Xeon Gold 5218R
The Xeon Gold 5218R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 25,000 points. Launch price was $1,273.

Xeon W-1390P
Xeon W-1390P
The Xeon W-1390P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-S (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 25,016 points. Launch price was $539.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 5218R packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the Xeon W-1390P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon Gold 5218R has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5218R versus 5.2 GHz on the Xeon W-1390P — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1390P (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5218R uses the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-1390P uses Rocket Lake-S (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5218R scores 25,000 against the Xeon W-1390P's 25,016 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon W-1390P. L3 cache: 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 5218R vs 16 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1390P.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5218R | Xeon W-1390P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 40+150% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 5.2 GHz+30% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.5 GHz+67% |
| L3 Cache | 27.5 MB+72% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 20 MB+3900% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Rocket Lake-S (2021) |
| PassMark | 25,000 | 25,016 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon Gold 5218R uses the LGA3647 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-1390P uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5218R | Xeon W-1390P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | 2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 | — |
| RAM Channels | 6 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5218R) / not specified (Xeon W-1390P). Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5218R rivals EPYC 7352.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5218R | Xeon W-1390P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













