
Xeon Gold 5218R
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6256
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 5218R
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 205W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6256 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,000 vs 25,334).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (28 MB vs 33 MB).
Xeon Gold 6256
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 28 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌64% higher power demand at 205W vs 125W.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 5218R
2020Xeon Gold 6256
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 205W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+20% larger total L3 cache (33 MB vs 28 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6256 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,000 vs 25,334).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (28 MB vs 33 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌64% higher power demand at 205W vs 125W.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6256 better than Xeon Gold 5218R?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5218R | Xeon Gold 6256 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5218R | Xeon Gold 6256 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 398 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 337 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 292 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 289 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 201 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5218R | Xeon Gold 6256 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 625 FPS | 633 FPS |
| medium | 625 FPS | 633 FPS |
| high | 625 FPS | 633 FPS |
| ultra | 625 FPS | 633 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 625 FPS | 633 FPS |
| medium | 625 FPS | 633 FPS |
| high | 625 FPS | 633 FPS |
| ultra | 559 FPS | 608 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 487 FPS | 528 FPS |
| medium | 399 FPS | 431 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 316 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5218R | Xeon Gold 6256 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 625 FPS | 633 FPS |
| medium | 625 FPS | 633 FPS |
| high | 625 FPS | 633 FPS |
| ultra | 567 FPS | 633 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 625 FPS | 633 FPS |
| medium | 590 FPS | 633 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 633 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 633 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 468 FPS | 633 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 633 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 560 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 5218R and Xeon Gold 6256

Xeon Gold 5218R
Xeon Gold 5218R
The Xeon Gold 5218R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 25,000 points. Launch price was $1,273.

Xeon Gold 6256
Xeon Gold 6256
The Xeon Gold 6256 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 25,334 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 5218R packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6256 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Gold 5218R has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5218R versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6256 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6256 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Xeon Gold 5218R is built on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5218R scores 25,000 against the Xeon Gold 6256's 25,334 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon Gold 6256. L3 cache: 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 5218R vs 33 MB on the Xeon Gold 6256.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5218R | Xeon Gold 6256 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 40+67% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4.5 GHz+13% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.6 GHz+71% |
| L3 Cache | 27.5 MB | 33 MB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 20 MB | — |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | — |
| PassMark | 25,000 | 25,334+1% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5218R | Xeon Gold 6256 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 | — |
| RAM Channels | 6 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5218R) / not specified (Xeon Gold 6256). Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5218R rivals EPYC 7352.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5218R | Xeon Gold 6256 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













