
Xeon Gold 5218R
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6240
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon Gold 5218R
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 150W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon Gold 6240
2019Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,918 vs 25,000).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 150W vs 125W.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 5218R
2020Xeon Gold 6240
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 150W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,918 vs 25,000).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 150W vs 125W.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 5218R better than Xeon Gold 6240?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5218R | Xeon Gold 6240 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5218R | Xeon Gold 6240 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 290 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 244 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 307 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 147 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5218R | Xeon Gold 6240 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 625 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 625 FPS | 623 FPS |
| high | 625 FPS | 623 FPS |
| ultra | 625 FPS | 623 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 625 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 625 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 625 FPS | 580 FPS |
| ultra | 559 FPS | 512 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 487 FPS | 462 FPS |
| medium | 399 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 261 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon Gold 5218R | Xeon Gold 6240 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 625 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 625 FPS | 623 FPS |
| high | 625 FPS | 623 FPS |
| ultra | 567 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 625 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 590 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 517 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 444 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 468 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 323 FPS | 328 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon Gold 5218R and Xeon Gold 6240

Xeon Gold 5218R
Xeon Gold 5218R
The Xeon Gold 5218R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 25,000 points. Launch price was $1,273.

Xeon Gold 6240
Xeon Gold 6240
The Xeon Gold 6240 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 18 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 24,918 points. Launch price was $2,445.
Processing Power
The Xeon Gold 5218R packs 20 cores / 40 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6240 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon Gold 5218R has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5218R versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6240 — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 5218R (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). Both are built on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon Gold 5218R scores 25,000 against the Xeon Gold 6240's 24,918 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon Gold 5218R. L3 cache: 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 5218R vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6240.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5218R | Xeon Gold 6240 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 40+11% | 18 / 36 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+3% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.6 GHz+24% |
| L3 Cache | 27.5 MB+11% | 24.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 20 MB+11% | 18 MB |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 25,000 | 24,918 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA3647 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5218R | Xeon Gold 6240 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA3647 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1024 | — |
| RAM Channels | 6 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 48 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5218R) / not specified (Xeon Gold 6240). Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5218R rivals EPYC 7352.
| Feature | Xeon Gold 5218R | Xeon Gold 6240 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













