
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Popular choices:

Xeon 6960P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 350W instead of 500W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌3.9% HIGHER MSRP$9,999 MSRPvs$9,625 MSRP
Xeon 6960P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $374 less on MSRP ($9,625 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (60,000 vs 81,000).
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 500W vs 350W.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
2023Xeon 6960P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 350W instead of 500W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 96) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $374 less on MSRP ($9,625 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌3.9% HIGHER MSRP$9,999 MSRPvs$9,625 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (60,000 vs 81,000).
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 500W vs 350W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX better than Xeon 6960P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 304 FPS | 196 FPS |
| medium | 288 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 194 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 233 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 109 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 780 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 676 FPS | 450 FPS |
| high | 545 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 293 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 477 FPS | 311 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 324 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 303 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 260 FPS | 174 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 795 FPS | 985 FPS |
| medium | 667 FPS | 874 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 826 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 734 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 704 FPS | 788 FPS |
| medium | 593 FPS | 689 FPS |
| high | 514 FPS | 651 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 579 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 495 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 420 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 317 FPS | 288 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1122 FPS | 985 FPS |
| medium | 997 FPS | 891 FPS |
| high | 874 FPS | 768 FPS |
| ultra | 771 FPS | 658 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 924 FPS | 764 FPS |
| medium | 801 FPS | 667 FPS |
| high | 706 FPS | 571 FPS |
| ultra | 614 FPS | 486 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 674 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 598 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 537 FPS | 430 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 369 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Xeon 6960P


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 143,017 points. Launch price was $9,999.

Xeon 6960P
Xeon 6960P
The Xeon 6960P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2024-09-24. It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 72 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 432 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA7529. Thermal design power (TDP): 500 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 130,659 points. Launch price was $9,625.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX packs 96 cores / 192 threads, while the Xeon 6960P offers 72 cores / 144 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon 6960P — a 26.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX uses the Storm Peak (2023) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon 6960P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX scores 143,017 against the Xeon 6960P's 130,659 — a 9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,100 vs 2,100, a 0% lead for the Xeon 6960P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 81,000 vs 60,000 (29.8% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX). L3 cache: 384 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX vs 432 MB (total) on the Xeon 6960P.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 96 / 192+33% | 72 / 144 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+31% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.7 GHz+8% |
| L3 Cache | 384 MB (total) | 432 MB (total)+13% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 5 nm | Intel 3 nm-40% |
| Architecture | Storm Peak (2023) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 143,017+9% | 130,659 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 148,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,100 | 2,100 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 81,000+35% | 60,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX uses the sTR5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6960P uses LGA7529 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The Xeon 6960P supports up to 3072 GB of RAM compared to 2048 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX) vs 12 (Xeon 6960P). PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX) vs 96 (Xeon 6960P) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX) and Intel 600 Series (Xeon 6960P).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sTR5 | LGA7529 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 3072 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+33% | 96 |
Advanced Features
Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6960P). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX targets Workstation / Scientific Computing, Xeon 6960P targets Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX rivals Xeon w9-3495X; Xeon 6960P rivals EPYC 9654.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Workstation / Scientific Computing | Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX launched at $9999 MSRP, while the Xeon 6960P debuted at $9625. On MSRP ($9999 vs $9625), the Xeon 6960P is $374 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX delivers 14.3 pts/$ vs 13.6 pts/$ for the Xeon 6960P — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX the 5.2% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $9999 | $9625-4% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.3+5% | 13.6 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











