
EPYC 9555
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 9555
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $173 less on MSRP ($9,826 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (133,253 vs 143,017).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Draws 350W instead of 360W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌1.8% HIGHER MSRP$9,999 MSRPvs$9,826 MSRP
EPYC 9555
2024Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $173 less on MSRP ($9,826 MSRP vs $9,999 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (384 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Draws 350W instead of 360W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (133,253 vs 143,017).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (256 MB vs 384 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌1.8% HIGHER MSRP$9,999 MSRPvs$9,826 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX better than EPYC 9555?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 9555 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 109 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 9555 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 655 FPS | 780 FPS |
| medium | 566 FPS | 676 FPS |
| high | 459 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 397 FPS | 470 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 546 FPS | 648 FPS |
| medium | 483 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 404 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 328 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 236 FPS | 260 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 9555 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 747 FPS | 795 FPS |
| medium | 634 FPS | 667 FPS |
| high | 590 FPS | 590 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 499 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 704 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 593 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 376 FPS | 436 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 317 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 9555 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1005 FPS | 1122 FPS |
| medium | 902 FPS | 997 FPS |
| high | 778 FPS | 874 FPS |
| ultra | 702 FPS | 771 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 809 FPS | 924 FPS |
| medium | 704 FPS | 801 FPS |
| high | 603 FPS | 706 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 614 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 674 FPS |
| medium | 510 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 537 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9555 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

EPYC 9555
EPYC 9555
The EPYC 9555 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 360 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 133,253 points. Launch price was $9,826.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 143,017 points. Launch price was $9,999.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9555 packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX offers 96 cores / 192 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9555 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The EPYC 9555 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9555 scores 133,253 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX's 143,017 — a 7.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9555 vs 384 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX.
| Feature | EPYC 9555 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128 | 96 / 192+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.1 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+28% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 384 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| PassMark | 133,253 | 143,017+7% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 148,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,100 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 81,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9555 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6000 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 6 TB — 198.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9555) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9555) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX).
| Feature | EPYC 9555 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6000 | DDR5-5200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6 TB+200% | 2048 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9555) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX). Primary use case: EPYC 9555 targets Data Center, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX targets Workstation / Scientific Computing. Direct competitor: EPYC 9555 rivals Xeon 6972P; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX rivals Xeon w9-3495X.
| Feature | EPYC 9555 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SEV-SNP | true |
| Target Use | Data Center | Workstation / Scientific Computing |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9555 launched at $9826 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX debuted at $9999. On MSRP ($9826 vs $9999), the EPYC 9555 is $173 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9555 delivers 13.6 pts/$ vs 14.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX the 5.3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9555 | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $9826-2% | $9999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.6 | 14.3+5% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












