
Xeon 6780E
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8592+
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon 6780E
2024Why buy it
- ✅+3.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($11,350 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 330W instead of 350W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅10% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (108 MB vs 320 MB).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Platinum 8592+
2023Why buy it
- ✅+196.3% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 108 MB).
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (84,013 vs 86,734).
- ❌2.2% HIGHER MSRP$11,600 MSRPvs$11,350 MSRP
Xeon 6780E
2024Xeon Platinum 8592+
2023Why buy it
- ✅+3.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($11,350 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 330W instead of 350W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅10% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+196.3% larger total L3 cache (320 MB vs 108 MB).
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (108 MB vs 320 MB).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (84,013 vs 86,734).
- ❌2.2% HIGHER MSRP$11,600 MSRPvs$11,350 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6780E better than Xeon Platinum 8592+?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon 6780E | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon 6780E | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 244 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 141 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 99 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon 6780E | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 934 FPS | 849 FPS |
| medium | 831 FPS | 768 FPS |
| high | 779 FPS | 730 FPS |
| ultra | 693 FPS | 641 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 737 FPS |
| medium | 655 FPS | 662 FPS |
| high | 614 FPS | 626 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 558 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 378 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 334 FPS | 364 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 303 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon 6780E | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 897 FPS | 938 FPS |
| medium | 807 FPS | 849 FPS |
| high | 691 FPS | 732 FPS |
| ultra | 588 FPS | 633 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 697 FPS | 776 FPS |
| medium | 606 FPS | 677 FPS |
| high | 517 FPS | 581 FPS |
| ultra | 436 FPS | 497 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 500 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 446 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 390 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 334 FPS | 383 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6780E and Xeon Platinum 8592+

Xeon 6780E
Xeon 6780E
The Xeon 6780E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 144 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 108 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 330 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 86,734 points. Launch price was $11,350.

Xeon Platinum 8592+
Xeon Platinum 8592+
The Xeon Platinum 8592+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 320 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 84,013 points. Launch price was $11,600.
Processing Power
The Xeon 6780E packs 144 cores / 144 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the Xeon 6780E has 80 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon 6780E versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8592+ (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Xeon 6780E uses the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6780E scores 86,734 against the Xeon Platinum 8592+'s 84,013 — a 3.2% lead for the Xeon 6780E. L3 cache: 108 MB (total) on the Xeon 6780E vs 320 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8592+.
| Feature | Xeon 6780E | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 144 / 144+125% | 64 / 128 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 3.9 GHz+30% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz+16% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 108 MB (total) | 320 MB (total)+196% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB (per module)+100% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 3 nm-70% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Sierra Forest (2024) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 86,734+3% | 84,013 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon 6780E uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6780E versus 5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — the Xeon Platinum 8592+ supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8592+ supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 4 TB — 199.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6780E) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8592+) — the Xeon 6780E offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Xeon 6780E | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4710 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | 5600+111900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 TB+104857500% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 88+10% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6780E) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8592+). Primary use case: Xeon 6780E targets Cloud Native Compute. Direct competitor: Xeon 6780E rivals EPYC 9754; Xeon Platinum 8592+ rivals EPYC 9554.
| Feature | Xeon 6780E | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Cloud Native Compute | — |
Value Analysis
The Xeon 6780E launched at $11350 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ debuted at $11600. On MSRP ($11350 vs $11600), the Xeon 6780E is $250 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6780E delivers 7.6 pts/$ vs 7.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — making the Xeon 6780E the 5.4% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon 6780E | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $11350-2% | $11600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.6+6% | 7.2 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













