PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Xeon 6780E

2024

Why buy it

✅+89.5% larger total L3 cache (108 MB vs 57 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
✅37.5% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8368 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (86,734 vs 92,054).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 12.8 PassMark/$ ($11,350 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
❌22.2% higher power demand at 330W vs 270W.

Xeon Platinum 8368

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $4,136 less on MSRP ($7,214 MSRP vs $11,350 MSRP).
✅Delivers 67.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.8 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($7,214 MSRP vs $11,350 MSRP).
✅Draws 270W instead of 330W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (57 MB vs 108 MB).
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon 6780E moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Xeon 6780E

2024

Xeon Platinum 8368

2021

Why buy it

✅+89.5% larger total L3 cache (108 MB vs 57 MB).
✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
✅37.5% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $4,136 less on MSRP ($7,214 MSRP vs $11,350 MSRP).
✅Delivers 67.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.8 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($7,214 MSRP vs $11,350 MSRP).
✅Draws 270W instead of 330W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8368 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (86,734 vs 92,054).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 12.8 PassMark/$ ($11,350 MSRP vs $7,214 MSRP).
❌22.2% higher power demand at 330W vs 270W.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (57 MB vs 108 MB).
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon 6780E moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8368 better than Xeon 6780E?

Yes. Xeon Platinum 8368 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 6.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data and 6.1% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Platinum 8368 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 6.9% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8368 is the better fit. You are getting 6.1% better PassMark, backed by 38 cores and 76 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8368 is the smarter buy today. Xeon Platinum 8368 is $4,136 cheaper on MSRP at $7,214 MSRP versus $11,350 MSRP, and it gives you a 6.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 67.0% better value on MSRP (12.8 vs 7.6 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6780E is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA4710 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, and 89.5% larger total L3 cache (108 MB vs 57 MB). That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Xeon 6780E Benchmark Check

Xeon Platinum 8368 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Xeon 6780E	Xeon Platinum 8368
1080p
low	189 FPS	185 FPS
medium	152 FPS	149 FPS
high	121 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	94 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	154 FPS
medium	119 FPS	120 FPS
high	91 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	74 FPS
4K
low	71 FPS	72 FPS
medium	59 FPS	60 FPS
high	46 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	38 FPS

Open Xeon 6780E Open Xeon Platinum 8368

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Xeon 6780E	Xeon Platinum 8368
1080p
low	244 FPS	412 FPS
medium	216 FPS	361 FPS
high	178 FPS	294 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	235 FPS
1440p
low	200 FPS	353 FPS
medium	181 FPS	314 FPS
high	154 FPS	264 FPS
ultra	120 FPS	203 FPS
4K
low	124 FPS	219 FPS
medium	115 FPS	198 FPS
high	100 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	81 FPS	135 FPS

Open Xeon 6780E Open Xeon Platinum 8368

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Xeon 6780E	Xeon Platinum 8368
1080p
low	934 FPS	935 FPS
medium	831 FPS	817 FPS
high	779 FPS	766 FPS
ultra	693 FPS	680 FPS
1440p
low	746 FPS	746 FPS
medium	655 FPS	643 FPS
high	614 FPS	603 FPS
ultra	546 FPS	535 FPS
4K
low	479 FPS	479 FPS
medium	378 FPS	378 FPS
high	334 FPS	334 FPS
ultra	272 FPS	272 FPS

Open Xeon 6780E Open Xeon Platinum 8368

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Xeon 6780E	Xeon Platinum 8368
1080p
low	897 FPS	911 FPS
medium	807 FPS	828 FPS
high	691 FPS	714 FPS
ultra	588 FPS	613 FPS
1440p
low	697 FPS	712 FPS
medium	606 FPS	625 FPS
high	517 FPS	537 FPS
ultra	436 FPS	460 FPS
4K
low	500 FPS	514 FPS
medium	446 FPS	459 FPS
high	390 FPS	403 FPS
ultra	334 FPS	351 FPS

Open Xeon 6780E Open Xeon Platinum 8368

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6780E and Xeon Platinum 8368

Xeon 6780E

The Xeon 6780E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 144 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 108 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 330 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 86,734 points. Launch price was $11,350.

Xeon Platinum 8368

The Xeon Platinum 8368 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 38 cores and 76 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 57 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 92,054 points. Launch price was $7,214.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon 6780E packs 144 cores / 144 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8368 offers 38 cores / 76 threads — the Xeon 6780E has 106 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon 6780E versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8368 — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8368 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Xeon 6780E uses the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8368 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6780E scores 86,734 against the Xeon Platinum 8368's 92,054 — a 6% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8368. L3 cache: 108 MB (total) on the Xeon 6780E vs 57 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8368.

Feature	Xeon 6780E	Xeon Platinum 8368
Cores / Threads	144 / 144+279%	38 / 76
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.4 GHz+13%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.4 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	108 MB (total)+89%	57 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB (per module)+300%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 3 nm-70%	10 nm
Architecture	Sierra Forest (2024)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	86,734	92,054+6%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	20,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,961
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	25,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 6780E uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8368 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6780E versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8368 — the Xeon 6780E supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8368 supports up to 6 TB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6780E) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8368) — the Xeon 6780E offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Xeon 6780E	Xeon Platinum 8368
Socket	LGA4710	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6400+25%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	4 TB	6 TB+50%
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	88+38%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6780E) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8368). Primary use case: Xeon 6780E targets Cloud Native Compute, Xeon Platinum 8368 targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6780E rivals EPYC 9754; Xeon Platinum 8368 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	Xeon 6780E	Xeon Platinum 8368
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Cloud Native Compute	Server

💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon 6780E launched at $11350 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8368 debuted at $7214. On MSRP ($11350 vs $7214), the Xeon Platinum 8368 is $4136 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6780E delivers 7.6 pts/$ vs 12.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8368 — making the Xeon Platinum 8368 the 50.2% better value option.