
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Popular choices:

Xeon 6780E
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
2020Why buy it
- ✅+137% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 108 MB).
- ✅Costs $5,861 less on MSRP ($5,489 MSRP vs $11,350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 98.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.2 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($5,489 MSRP vs $11,350 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 330W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6780E across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (83,235 vs 86,734).
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon 6780E moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
Xeon 6780E
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (108 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($11,350 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).
- ❌17.9% higher power demand at 330W vs 280W.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
2020Xeon 6780E
2024Why buy it
- ✅+137% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 108 MB).
- ✅Costs $5,861 less on MSRP ($5,489 MSRP vs $11,350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 98.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.2 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($5,489 MSRP vs $11,350 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 280W instead of 330W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅45.5% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 88) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6780E across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (83,235 vs 86,734).
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Xeon 6780E moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (108 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($11,350 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).
- ❌17.9% higher power demand at 330W vs 280W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6780E better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 571 FPS | 244 FPS |
| medium | 495 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 380 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 325 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 480 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 423 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 336 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 269 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 230 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 81 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 934 FPS |
| medium | 546 FPS | 831 FPS |
| high | 481 FPS | 779 FPS |
| ultra | 412 FPS | 693 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 555 FPS | 746 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 655 FPS |
| high | 412 FPS | 614 FPS |
| ultra | 354 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 323 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 272 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 909 FPS | 897 FPS |
| medium | 818 FPS | 807 FPS |
| high | 695 FPS | 691 FPS |
| ultra | 604 FPS | 588 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 739 FPS | 697 FPS |
| medium | 643 FPS | 606 FPS |
| high | 545 FPS | 517 FPS |
| ultra | 463 FPS | 436 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 514 FPS | 500 FPS |
| medium | 461 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 346 FPS | 334 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX and Xeon 6780E


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 83,235 points. Launch price was $5,500.

Xeon 6780E
Xeon 6780E
The Xeon 6780E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 144 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 108 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 330 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 86,734 points. Launch price was $11,350.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX packs 64 cores / 128 threads, while the Xeon 6780E offers 144 cores / 144 threads — the Xeon 6780E has 80 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX versus 3 GHz on the Xeon 6780E — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon 6780E uses Sierra Forest (2024) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX scores 83,235 against the Xeon 6780E's 86,734 — a 4.1% lead for the Xeon 6780E. L3 cache: 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX vs 108 MB (total) on the Xeon 6780E.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 64 / 128 | 144 / 144+125% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+40% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+23% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB+137% | 108 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 4 MB (per module)+700% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Sierra Forest (2024) |
| PassMark | 83,235 | 86,734+4% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 64,355 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,266 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 20,256 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX uses the sWRX8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6780E uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6780E — the Xeon 6780E supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 199.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX) vs 88 (Xeon 6780E) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | sWRX8 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 2048 GB | 4 TB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+45% | 88 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX) vs VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6780E). Primary use case: Xeon 6780E targets Cloud Native Compute. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX rivals Xeon Platinum 8280; Xeon 6780E rivals EPYC 9754.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT |
| Target Use | — | Cloud Native Compute |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX launched at $5489 MSRP, while the Xeon 6780E debuted at $11350. On MSRP ($5489 vs $11350), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is $5861 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX delivers 15.2 pts/$ vs 7.6 pts/$ for the Xeon 6780E — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX the 66% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX | Xeon 6780E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5489-52% | $11350 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.2+100% | 7.6 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












