
Xeon 6740E
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon 6740E
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,232 less on MSRP ($5,265 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 18.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.5 vs 12.3 PassMark/$ ($5,265 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 350W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (76,167 vs 79,683).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 300 MB).
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 96 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.3 vs 14.5 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
- ❌40% higher power demand at 350W vs 250W.
Xeon 6740E
2024Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,232 less on MSRP ($5,265 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 18.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.5 vs 12.3 PassMark/$ ($5,265 MSRP vs $6,497 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 350W, a 100W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (300 MB vs 96 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (76,167 vs 79,683).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 300 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.3 vs 14.5 PassMark/$ ($6,497 MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
- ❌40% higher power demand at 350W vs 250W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ better than Xeon 6740E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon 6740E | Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon 6740E | Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 437 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 378 FPS | 448 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 241 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 359 FPS | 419 FPS |
| medium | 319 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 266 FPS | 317 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 253 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 168 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 174 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon 6740E | Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 934 FPS | 910 FPS |
| medium | 831 FPS | 838 FPS |
| high | 779 FPS | 791 FPS |
| ultra | 693 FPS | 698 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 782 FPS |
| medium | 655 FPS | 716 FPS |
| high | 614 FPS | 673 FPS |
| ultra | 546 FPS | 601 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 528 FPS |
| medium | 378 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 334 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 330 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon 6740E | Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 918 FPS | 954 FPS |
| medium | 830 FPS | 865 FPS |
| high | 715 FPS | 748 FPS |
| ultra | 610 FPS | 649 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 710 FPS | 789 FPS |
| medium | 620 FPS | 689 FPS |
| high | 530 FPS | 593 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 510 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 509 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 455 FPS | 513 FPS |
| high | 400 FPS | 455 FPS |
| ultra | 344 FPS | 392 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6740E and Xeon Platinum 8568Y+

Xeon 6740E
Xeon 6740E
The Xeon 6740E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 96 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 76,167 points. Launch price was $5,265.

Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
The Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 79,683 points. Launch price was $6,497.
Processing Power
The Xeon 6740E packs 96 cores / 96 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon 6740E has 48 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon 6740E versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Xeon 6740E uses the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6740E scores 76,167 against the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+'s 79,683 — a 4.5% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+. L3 cache: 96 MB (total) on the Xeon 6740E vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+.
| Feature | Xeon 6740E | Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 96 / 96+100% | 48 / 96 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 4 GHz+25% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+4% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 96 MB (total) | 300 MB (total)+213% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB (per module)+100% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 3 nm-70% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Sierra Forest (2024) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 76,167 | 79,683+5% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,961 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 55,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon 6740E uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the Xeon 6740E versus DDR5-5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ — the Xeon 6740E supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 4096 of RAM. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 80 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon 6740E) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8568Y+).
| Feature | Xeon 6740E | Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4710 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 6400+127900% | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4096 | 4096 GB+104857500% |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 80 | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, TDX (Xeon 6740E) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8568Y+). Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ targets High Performance Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6740E rivals EPYC 9005; Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ rivals EPYC 9554.
| Feature | Xeon 6740E | Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, TDX | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | High Performance Server |
Value Analysis
The Xeon 6740E launched at $5265 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ debuted at $6497. On MSRP ($5265 vs $6497), the Xeon 6740E is $1232 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6740E delivers 14.5 pts/$ vs 12.3 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ — making the Xeon 6740E the 16.5% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon 6740E | Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5265-19% | $6497 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.5+18% | 12.3 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













