
Xeon 6520P
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6438Y+
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon 6520P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 144 MB vs 60 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
- ✅Costs $1,312 less on MSRP ($1,295 MSRP vs $2,607 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 105.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.4 vs 24.0 PassMark/$ ($1,295 MSRP vs $2,607 MSRP).
- ✅10% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon Gold 6438Y+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 205W instead of 210W, a 5W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (60 MB vs 144 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark (62,660 vs 64,010).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.0 vs 49.4 PassMark/$ ($2,607 MSRP vs $1,295 MSRP).
Xeon 6520P
2025Xeon Gold 6438Y+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 144 MB vs 60 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
- ✅Costs $1,312 less on MSRP ($1,295 MSRP vs $2,607 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 105.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 49.4 vs 24.0 PassMark/$ ($1,295 MSRP vs $2,607 MSRP).
- ✅10% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 80) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 205W instead of 210W, a 5W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (60 MB vs 144 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark (62,660 vs 64,010).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.0 vs 49.4 PassMark/$ ($2,607 MSRP vs $1,295 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6520P better than Xeon Gold 6438Y+?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon 6520P | Xeon Gold 6438Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 165 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon 6520P | Xeon Gold 6438Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 520 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 460 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 375 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 383 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 321 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 256 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 98 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon 6520P | Xeon Gold 6438Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 910 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 838 FPS | 961 FPS |
| high | 791 FPS | 906 FPS |
| ultra | 698 FPS | 822 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 782 FPS | 831 FPS |
| medium | 716 FPS | 739 FPS |
| high | 673 FPS | 685 FPS |
| ultra | 601 FPS | 615 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 528 FPS | 531 FPS |
| medium | 444 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 378 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 310 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon 6520P | Xeon Gold 6438Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 985 FPS | 916 FPS |
| medium | 887 FPS | 832 FPS |
| high | 767 FPS | 717 FPS |
| ultra | 666 FPS | 621 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 804 FPS | 721 FPS |
| medium | 700 FPS | 634 FPS |
| high | 603 FPS | 543 FPS |
| ultra | 519 FPS | 470 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 521 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 462 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 398 FPS | 354 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6520P and Xeon Gold 6438Y+

Xeon 6520P
Xeon 6520P
The Xeon 6520P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 64,010 points. Launch price was $1,295.

Xeon Gold 6438Y+
Xeon Gold 6438Y+
The Xeon Gold 6438Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 62,660 points. Launch price was $3,141.
Processing Power
The Xeon 6520P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon 6520P versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon 6520P uses the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6520P scores 64,010 against the Xeon Gold 6438Y+'s 62,660 — a 2.1% lead for the Xeon 6520P. L3 cache: 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6520P vs 60 MB on the Xeon Gold 6438Y+.
| Feature | Xeon 6520P | Xeon Gold 6438Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 32 / 64+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz+20% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 144 MB (total)+140% | 60 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 3 nm-70% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 64,010+2% | 62,660 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,900 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 25,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon 6520P uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6520P versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ — the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6438Y+ supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 4 TB — 199.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6520P) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6438Y+) — the Xeon 6520P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FCLGA4710 (Xeon 6520P) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6438Y+).
| Feature | Xeon 6520P | Xeon Gold 6438Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4710 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | 4800+95900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 TB+104857500% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 88+10% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon 6520P targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6520P rivals EPYC 9254; Xeon Gold 6438Y+ rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | Xeon 6520P | Xeon Gold 6438Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Server | — |
Value Analysis
The Xeon 6520P launched at $1295 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ debuted at $2607. On MSRP ($1295 vs $2607), the Xeon 6520P is $1312 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6520P delivers 49.4 pts/$ vs 24.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6438Y+ — making the Xeon 6520P the 69.1% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon 6520P | Xeon Gold 6438Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1295-50% | $2607 |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.4+106% | 24.0 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













