
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon 6520P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $966 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,295 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 49.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,295 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 210W, a 145W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 64,010).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 144 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6520P, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6520P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
Xeon 6520P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+185.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+350% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 49.4 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($1,295 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌223.1% higher power demand at 210W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon 6520P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $966 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,295 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 49.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,295 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 210W, a 145W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+185.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+350% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 64,010).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 144 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6520P, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6520P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 49.4 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($1,295 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌223.1% higher power demand at 210W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon 6520P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6520P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6520P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 520 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 321 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 256 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 176 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6520P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 910 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 838 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 791 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 698 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 782 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 716 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 673 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 601 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 528 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 330 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6520P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 985 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 887 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 767 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 666 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 804 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 700 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 603 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 519 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 580 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 521 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 462 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 398 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon 6520P


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon 6520P
Xeon 6520P
The Xeon 6520P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 64,010 points. Launch price was $1,295.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon 6520P offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon 6520P has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4 GHz on the Xeon 6520P — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon 6520P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon 6520P's 64,010 — a 96.2% lead for the Xeon 6520P. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6520P.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6520P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 24 / 48+200% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+10% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+50% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 144 MB (total)+350% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 64,010+185% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,900 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 25,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6520P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6520P — the Xeon 6520P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Xeon 6520P). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 88 (Xeon 6520P) — the Xeon 6520P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and FCLGA4710 (Xeon 6520P).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6520P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 4 TB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 88+267% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6520P). Primary use case: Xeon 6520P targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6520P rivals EPYC 9254.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6520P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon 6520P debuted at $1295. On MSRP ($329 vs $1295), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $966 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 49.4 pts/$ for the Xeon 6520P — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 31.9% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6520P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-75% | $1295 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+38% | 49.4 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











