
Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:

Xeon 6517P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $646 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,195 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 73.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 40.8 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,195 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 190W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (38,955 vs 48,810).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6517P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6517P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
Xeon 6517P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+25.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 40.8 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($1,195 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌81% higher power demand at 190W vs 105W.
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Xeon 6517P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $646 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,195 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 73.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 40.8 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,195 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 190W, a 85W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+25.3% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (38,955 vs 48,810).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6517P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6517P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 40.8 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($1,195 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌81% higher power demand at 190W vs 105W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Xeon 6517P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6517P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 291 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 307 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6517P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 772 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 647 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 508 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 450 FPS | 353 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 619 FPS | 483 FPS |
| medium | 536 FPS | 426 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 364 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 318 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 220 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6517P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 832 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 645 FPS | 986 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 910 FPS |
| ultra | 459 FPS | 824 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 721 FPS | 859 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 755 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 697 FPS |
| ultra | 407 FPS | 626 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 374 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 319 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6517P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 974 FPS | 1022 FPS |
| medium | 974 FPS | 916 FPS |
| high | 934 FPS | 782 FPS |
| ultra | 826 FPS | 672 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 959 FPS | 788 FPS |
| medium | 843 FPS | 689 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 586 FPS |
| ultra | 617 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 694 FPS | 563 FPS |
| medium | 621 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 541 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 377 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Xeon 6517P


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon 6517P
Xeon 6517P
The Xeon 6517P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 72 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 190 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 48,810 points. Launch price was $1,195.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon 6517P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon 6517P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon 6517P — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon 6517P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Xeon 6517P's 48,810 — a 22.5% lead for the Xeon 6517P. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 72 MB (total) on the Xeon 6517P.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6517P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 16 / 32+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+14% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+16% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB | 72 MB (total)+13% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 38,955 | 48,810+25% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,174 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,888 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6517P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 6400 on the Xeon 6517P — the Xeon 6517P supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6517P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 8 (Xeon 6517P). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 88 (Xeon 6517P) — the Xeon 6517P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X) and Granite Rapids-SP (Xeon 6517P).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6517P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 6400+159900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+3276700% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 88+267% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon 6517P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6517P). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K; Xeon 6517P rivals EPYC 9554.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6517P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 5900X launched at $549 MSRP, while the Xeon 6517P debuted at $1195. On MSRP ($549 vs $1195), the Ryzen 9 5900X is $646 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 5900X delivers 71.0 pts/$ vs 40.8 pts/$ for the Xeon 6517P — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 53.9% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 5900X | Xeon 6517P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-54% | $1195 |
| Performance per Dollar | 71.0+74% | 40.8 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












