PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 9 5900X

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Costs $881 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,430 MSRP).
✅Delivers 158.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 27.5 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,430 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 250W, a 145W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (38,955 vs 39,293).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3335, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon W-3335

2021

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($1,430 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
❌138.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 105W.

Ryzen 9 5900X

2020

Xeon W-3335

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Costs $881 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,430 MSRP).
✅Delivers 158.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 71.0 vs 27.5 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,430 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 250W, a 145W reduction.

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (38,955 vs 39,293).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3335, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($1,430 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
❌138.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 105W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 5900X better than Xeon W-3335?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-3335 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 5900X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3335 is the better fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 5900X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 9 5900X is $881 cheaper on MSRP at $549 MSRP versus $1,430 MSRP, and it gives you a 6.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon W-3335 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.9% better PassMark. It is also 158.2% better value on MSRP (71.0 vs 27.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-3335 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2020), more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 12/24, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 9 5900X Benchmark Check

Xeon W-3335 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon W-3335
1080p
low	323 FPS	182 FPS
medium	291 FPS	144 FPS
high	243 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	193 FPS	92 FPS
1440p
low	307 FPS	148 FPS
medium	248 FPS	115 FPS
high	192 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	157 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	193 FPS	68 FPS
medium	156 FPS	57 FPS
high	115 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	103 FPS	36 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 5900X Open Xeon W-3335

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon W-3335
1080p
low	772 FPS	447 FPS
medium	647 FPS	385 FPS
high	508 FPS	316 FPS
ultra	450 FPS	266 FPS
1440p
low	619 FPS	385 FPS
medium	536 FPS	342 FPS
high	443 FPS	287 FPS
ultra	364 FPS	237 FPS
4K
low	365 FPS	248 FPS
medium	318 FPS	223 FPS
high	289 FPS	199 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	165 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 5900X Open Xeon W-3335

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon W-3335
1080p
low	832 FPS	982 FPS
medium	645 FPS	962 FPS
high	558 FPS	905 FPS
ultra	459 FPS	819 FPS
1440p
low	721 FPS	836 FPS
medium	565 FPS	736 FPS
high	488 FPS	692 FPS
ultra	407 FPS	618 FPS
4K
low	511 FPS	537 FPS
medium	421 FPS	438 FPS
high	374 FPS	386 FPS
ultra	308 FPS	315 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 5900X Open Xeon W-3335

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon W-3335
1080p
low	974 FPS	982 FPS
medium	974 FPS	868 FPS
high	934 FPS	751 FPS
ultra	826 FPS	639 FPS
1440p
low	959 FPS	790 FPS
medium	843 FPS	676 FPS
high	726 FPS	582 FPS
ultra	617 FPS	496 FPS
4K
low	694 FPS	550 FPS
medium	621 FPS	480 FPS
high	541 FPS	429 FPS
ultra	437 FPS	363 FPS

Open Ryzen 9 5900X Open Xeon W-3335

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 5900X and Xeon W-3335

Ryzen 9 5900X

The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.

Xeon W-3335

The Xeon W-3335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 39,293 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 5900X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-3335 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon W-3335 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3335 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-3335 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 5900X scores 38,955 against the Xeon W-3335's 39,293 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon W-3335. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3335.

Feature	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon W-3335
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	16 / 32+33%
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+20%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+9%	3.4 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB+167%	24 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm, 12 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022)	Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark	38,955	39,293
Cinebench R23 Multi	21,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,174	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,888	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 5900X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3335 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X versus 3200 on the Xeon W-3335 — the Xeon W-3335 supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3335 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 8 (Xeon W-3335). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs 64 (Xeon W-3335) — the Xeon W-3335 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X) and W790 (Xeon W-3335).

Feature	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon W-3335
Socket	AM4	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	3200+79900%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+3276700%	4096
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	64+167%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-3335 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3335). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K; Xeon W-3335 rivals EPYC 7402.

Feature	Ryzen 9 5900X	Xeon W-3335
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Workstation	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 9 5900X launched at $549 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3335 debuted at $1430. On MSRP ($549 vs $1430), the Ryzen 9 5900X is $881 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 5900X delivers 71.0 pts/$ vs 27.5 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3335 — making the Ryzen 9 5900X the 88.3% better value option.