
Core Ultra 5 245
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 5900X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core Ultra 5 245
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $230 less on MSRP ($319 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 77.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 125.9 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($319 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1851 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics, while Ryzen 9 5900X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (38,955 vs 40,165).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 71.0 vs 125.9 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $319 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 245 moves to LGA1851 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 245 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core Ultra 5 245
2025Ryzen 9 5900X
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $230 less on MSRP ($319 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 77.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 125.9 vs 71.0 PassMark/$ ($319 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1851 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics, while Ryzen 9 5900X needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (38,955 vs 40,165).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 71.0 vs 125.9 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $319 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 245 moves to LGA1851 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 245 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 245 better than Ryzen 9 5900X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 263 FPS | 291 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 194 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 103 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 668 FPS | 772 FPS |
| medium | 564 FPS | 647 FPS |
| high | 469 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 429 FPS | 450 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 579 FPS | 619 FPS |
| medium | 509 FPS | 536 FPS |
| high | 426 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 342 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 306 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 289 FPS |
| ultra | 256 FPS | 255 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 845 FPS | 832 FPS |
| medium | 689 FPS | 645 FPS |
| high | 613 FPS | 558 FPS |
| ultra | 525 FPS | 459 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 730 FPS | 721 FPS |
| medium | 598 FPS | 565 FPS |
| high | 519 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 441 FPS | 407 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 505 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 425 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 308 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 1004 FPS | 974 FPS |
| medium | 956 FPS | 974 FPS |
| high | 834 FPS | 934 FPS |
| ultra | 758 FPS | 826 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 865 FPS | 959 FPS |
| medium | 764 FPS | 843 FPS |
| high | 663 FPS | 726 FPS |
| ultra | 589 FPS | 617 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 585 FPS | 694 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 621 FPS |
| high | 472 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 417 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 245 and Ryzen 9 5900X

Core Ultra 5 245
Core Ultra 5 245
The Core Ultra 5 245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 40,165 points. Launch price was $270.


Ryzen 9 5900X
Ryzen 9 5900X
The Ryzen 9 5900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 38,955 points. Launch price was $549.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 245 packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core Ultra 5 245 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 245 versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900X — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 245 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 245 uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 245 scores 40,165 against the Ryzen 9 5900X's 38,955 — a 3.1% lead for the Core Ultra 5 245. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 245 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900X.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 14+17% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+6% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 64 MB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+500% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Vermeer (Zen3) (2020−2022) |
| PassMark | 40,165+3% | 38,955 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 21,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,174 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,888 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 245 uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the Core Ultra 5 245 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900X — the Core Ultra 5 245 supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 5 245 supports up to 256 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core Ultra 5 245) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900X) — the Ryzen 9 5900X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 245) and A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 9 5900X).
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6400+159900% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 | 128 GB+52428700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 5900X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 245) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900X). The Core Ultra 5 245 includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics), while the Ryzen 9 5900X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900X targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 245 rivals Ryzen 5 9600X; Ryzen 9 5900X rivals Core i9-12900K.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 5 245 launched at $319 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 5900X debuted at $549. On MSRP ($319 vs $549), the Core Ultra 5 245 is $230 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 245 delivers 125.9 pts/$ vs 71.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900X — making the Core Ultra 5 245 the 55.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245 | Ryzen 9 5900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $319-42% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 125.9+77% | 71.0 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












