Core Ultra 5 235 vs Core Ultra 5 245

Intel

Core Ultra 5 235

14 Cores14 Thrd65 WWMax: 5 GHz2025

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core Ultra 5 245

14 Cores14 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core Ultra 5 235

2025

Why buy it

  • Costs $62 less on MSRP ($257 MSRP vs $319 MSRP).
  • Delivers 23.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 155.3 vs 125.9 PassMark/$ ($257 MSRP vs $319 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (39,924 vs 40,165).

Core Ultra 5 245

2025

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 125.9 vs 155.3 PassMark/$ ($319 MSRP vs $257 MSRP).

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core Ultra 5 245 better than Core Ultra 5 235?
    Yes. Core Ultra 5 245 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 0.5% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 5 245 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 2 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 245 is the better fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 14 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core Ultra 5 245 is still the faster CPU overall, but Core Ultra 5 235 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core Ultra 5 245 is 24.1% more expensive on MSRP at $319 MSRP versus $257 MSRP, and it gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core Ultra 5 235 is also 23.4% better value on MSRP (155.3 vs 125.9 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core Ultra 5 245 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 14 threads instead of 14/14. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Games Benchmarks

    Paired with RTX 4090

    To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

    Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

    Path of Exile 2

    Path of Exile 2

    PresetCore Ultra 5 235Core Ultra 5 245
    1080p
    low278 FPS278 FPS
    medium263 FPS263 FPS
    high222 FPS222 FPS
    ultra189 FPS189 FPS
    1440p
    low230 FPS230 FPS
    medium194 FPS194 FPS
    high158 FPS158 FPS
    ultra137 FPS138 FPS
    4K
    low152 FPS153 FPS
    medium128 FPS128 FPS
    high99 FPS100 FPS
    ultra87 FPS88 FPS
    Counter-Strike 2

    Counter-Strike 2

    PresetCore Ultra 5 235Core Ultra 5 245
    1080p
    low663 FPS668 FPS
    medium562 FPS564 FPS
    high467 FPS469 FPS
    ultra427 FPS429 FPS
    1440p
    low574 FPS579 FPS
    medium509 FPS509 FPS
    high426 FPS426 FPS
    ultra369 FPS369 FPS
    4K
    low342 FPS342 FPS
    medium306 FPS306 FPS
    high291 FPS291 FPS
    ultra256 FPS256 FPS
    League of Legends

    League of Legends

    PresetCore Ultra 5 235Core Ultra 5 245
    1080p
    low839 FPS845 FPS
    medium681 FPS689 FPS
    high610 FPS613 FPS
    ultra522 FPS525 FPS
    1440p
    low727 FPS730 FPS
    medium590 FPS598 FPS
    high516 FPS519 FPS
    ultra441 FPS441 FPS
    4K
    low504 FPS505 FPS
    medium422 FPS425 FPS
    high377 FPS383 FPS
    ultra318 FPS324 FPS
    Valorant

    Valorant

    PresetCore Ultra 5 235Core Ultra 5 245
    1080p
    low989 FPS1004 FPS
    medium891 FPS956 FPS
    high778 FPS834 FPS
    ultra699 FPS758 FPS
    1440p
    low810 FPS865 FPS
    medium717 FPS764 FPS
    high624 FPS663 FPS
    ultra548 FPS589 FPS
    4K
    low567 FPS585 FPS
    medium512 FPS525 FPS
    high459 FPS472 FPS
    ultra404 FPS417 FPS

    Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 235 and Core Ultra 5 245

    Intel

    Core Ultra 5 235

    The Core Ultra 5 235 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 39,924 points. Launch price was $257.

    Intel

    Core Ultra 5 245

    The Core Ultra 5 245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 40,165 points. Launch price was $270.

    Processing Power

    Both the Core Ultra 5 235 and Core Ultra 5 245 share an identical 14-core/14-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 235 versus 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 245 — a 2% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 245 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). Both are built on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture using a 3 nm process. In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 235 scores 39,924 against the Core Ultra 5 245's 40,165 — a 0.6% lead for the Core Ultra 5 245. Both processors carry 24 MB (total) of L3 cache.

    FeatureCore Ultra 5 235Core Ultra 5 245
    Cores / Threads
    14 / 14
    14 / 14
    Boost Clock
    5 GHz
    5.1 GHz+2%
    Base Clock
    3.4 GHz
    3.5 GHz+3%
    L3 Cache
    24 MB (total)
    24 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    3 MB (per core)
    3 MB (per core)
    Process
    3 nm
    3 nm
    Architecture
    Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
    Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
    PassMark
    39,924
    40,165
    Geekbench 6 Single
    2,600
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    13,000
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    Both processors use the LGA1851 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 235 versus 6400 on the Core Ultra 5 245 — the Core Ultra 5 245 supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 256 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 235) and Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 245).

    FeatureCore Ultra 5 235Core Ultra 5 245
    Socket
    LGA1851
    LGA1851
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 5.0
    PCIe 5.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR5-6400
    6400+127900%
    Max RAM Capacity
    256 GB+104857500%
    256
    RAM Channels
    2
    2
    ECC Support
    Yes
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    20
    20
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Both include integrated graphics Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU (Core Ultra 5 235) and Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics (Core Ultra 5 245) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 235 targets Mainstream Desktop. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 235 rivals Ryzen 5 8600G; Core Ultra 5 245 rivals Ryzen 5 9600X.

    FeatureCore Ultra 5 235Core Ultra 5 245
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU
    Intel Arc Xe-LPG Graphics
    Unlocked
    No
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d
    VT-x, VT-d
    Target Use
    Mainstream Desktop
    💰

    Value Analysis

    The Core Ultra 5 235 launched at $257 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 5 245 debuted at $319. On MSRP ($257 vs $319), the Core Ultra 5 235 is $62 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 235 delivers 155.3 pts/$ vs 125.9 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 245 — making the Core Ultra 5 235 the 20.9% better value option.

    FeatureCore Ultra 5 235Core Ultra 5 245
    MSRP
    $257-19%
    $319
    Performance per Dollar
    155.3+23%
    125.9
    Release Date
    2025
    2025