PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $866 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,195 MSRP).
✅Delivers 66.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 40.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,195 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 190W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 48,810).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 72 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6517P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6517P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Xeon 6517P

2025

Why buy it

✅+117.6% higher PassMark.
✅+125% larger total L3 cache (72 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 40.8 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($1,195 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌192.3% higher power demand at 190W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Xeon 6517P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $866 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,195 MSRP).
✅Delivers 66.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 40.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,195 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 190W, a 125W reduction.

Why buy it

✅+117.6% higher PassMark.
✅+125% larger total L3 cache (72 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 48,810).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 72 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6517P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6517P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 40.8 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($1,195 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌192.3% higher power demand at 190W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon 6517P?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon 6517P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6517P is the better fit. You are getting 117.6% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 125% larger total L3 cache (72 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 3700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 3700X is $866 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $1,195 MSRP, and it gives you a 4.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon 6517P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 117.6% better PassMark. It is also 66.9% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 40.8 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6517P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4710 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 125% larger total L3 cache (72 MB vs 32 MB), more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 3700X Benchmark Check

Xeon 6517P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6517P
1080p
low	200 FPS	192 FPS
medium	163 FPS	153 FPS
high	137 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	97 FPS
1440p
low	156 FPS	157 FPS
medium	121 FPS	122 FPS
high	100 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	84 FPS	72 FPS
medium	71 FPS	60 FPS
high	56 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	38 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon 6517P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6517P
1080p
low	561 FPS	559 FPS
medium	525 FPS	488 FPS
high	428 FPS	396 FPS
ultra	383 FPS	353 FPS
1440p
low	545 FPS	483 FPS
medium	471 FPS	426 FPS
high	394 FPS	357 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	299 FPS
4K
low	350 FPS	302 FPS
medium	304 FPS	270 FPS
high	274 FPS	244 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	220 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon 6517P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6517P
1080p
low	561 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	561 FPS	986 FPS
high	561 FPS	910 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	824 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	859 FPS
medium	561 FPS	755 FPS
high	538 FPS	697 FPS
ultra	470 FPS	626 FPS
4K
low	499 FPS	541 FPS
medium	394 FPS	442 FPS
high	343 FPS	389 FPS
ultra	275 FPS	319 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon 6517P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6517P
1080p
low	561 FPS	1022 FPS
medium	561 FPS	916 FPS
high	561 FPS	782 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	672 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	788 FPS
medium	561 FPS	689 FPS
high	561 FPS	586 FPS
ultra	555 FPS	504 FPS
4K
low	561 FPS	563 FPS
medium	501 FPS	501 FPS
high	447 FPS	441 FPS
ultra	396 FPS	377 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon 6517P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon 6517P

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon 6517P

The Xeon 6517P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 72 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 190 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 48,810 points. Launch price was $1,195.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon 6517P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon 6517P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon 6517P — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon 6517P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon 6517P's 48,810 — a 74.1% lead for the Xeon 6517P. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 72 MB (total) on the Xeon 6517P.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6517P
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+5%	4.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+12%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB	72 MB (total)+125%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm, 12 nm	Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	22,430	48,810+118%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6517P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 6400 on the Xeon 6517P — the Xeon 6517P supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6517P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Xeon 6517P). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 88 (Xeon 6517P) — the Xeon 6517P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and Granite Rapids-SP (Xeon 6517P).

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6517P
Socket	AM4	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	6400+159900%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+3276700%	4096
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	88+267%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6517P). Direct competitor: Xeon 6517P rivals EPYC 9554.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6517P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon 6517P debuted at $1195. On MSRP ($329 vs $1195), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $866 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 40.8 pts/$ for the Xeon 6517P — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 50.1% better value option.