
TITAN RTX
Popular choices:

TITAN V
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
TITAN RTX
2018Why buy it
- ✅33.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($2,499 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 20.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.0 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than TITAN V: it remains the more sensible modern option while TITAN V is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
TITAN V
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than TITAN RTX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌20% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$2,499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
TITAN RTX
2018TITAN V
2017Why buy it
- ✅33.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($2,499 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 20.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.0 vs 6.7 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than TITAN V: it remains the more sensible modern option while TITAN V is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than TITAN RTX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌20% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$2,499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is TITAN RTX better than TITAN V?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is TITAN V still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | TITAN RTX | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 145 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 29 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | TITAN RTX | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 350 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 333 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 280 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 233 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 65 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | TITAN RTX | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 904 FPS | 875 FPS |
| medium | 723 FPS | 715 FPS |
| high | 603 FPS | 602 FPS |
| ultra | 452 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 678 FPS | 678 FPS |
| medium | 543 FPS | 542 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 452 FPS | 452 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 301 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | TITAN RTX | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 632 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 555 FPS | 263 FPS |
| high | 478 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 191 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 459 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 339 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 337 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 282 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 79 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of TITAN RTX and TITAN V

TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX
The TITAN RTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 18 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 280W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,095 points. Launch price was $2,499.

TITAN V
TITAN V
The TITAN V is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2017. It features the Volta architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,077 points. Launch price was $2,999.
Graphics Performance
The TITAN RTX scores 20,095 and the TITAN V reaches 20,077 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The TITAN RTX is built on Turing while the TITAN V uses Volta, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 4,608 (TITAN RTX) vs 5,120 (TITAN V). Raw compute: 16.31 TFLOPS (TITAN RTX) vs 14.9 TFLOPS (TITAN V). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1455 MHz.
| Feature | TITAN RTX | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,095 | 20,077 |
| Architecture | Turing | Volta |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608 | 5120+11% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.31 TFLOPS+9% | 14.9 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz+22% | 1455 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 288 | 320+11% |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB | 7.5 MB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+33% | 4.5 MB |
| Tensor Cores | 576 | 640+11% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The TITAN RTX gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The TITAN V relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | TITAN RTX | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The TITAN RTX comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN V has 12 GB. The TITAN RTX offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 672 GB/s (TITAN RTX) vs 653 GB/s (TITAN V) — a 2.9% advantage for the TITAN RTX. Bus width: 384-bit vs 3072-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (TITAN RTX) vs 4.5 MB (TITAN V) — the TITAN RTX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | TITAN RTX | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+100% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 672 GB/s+3% | 653 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 3072-bit+700% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+33% | 4.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (TITAN RTX) vs 12.1 (TITAN V). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | TITAN RTX | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (TITAN RTX) vs NVENC 6.0 (TITAN V). Decoder: NVDEC (4th Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (TITAN RTX) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (TITAN V).
| Feature | TITAN RTX | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (7th Gen) | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (4th Gen) | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The TITAN RTX draws 280W versus the TITAN V's 250W — a 11.3% difference. The TITAN V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (TITAN RTX) vs 600W (TITAN V). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 85°C.
| Feature | TITAN RTX | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 280W | 250W-11% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 600W-8% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 116mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 71.8 | 80.3+12% |
Value Analysis
The TITAN RTX launched at $2499 MSRP, while the TITAN V launched at $2999. The TITAN RTX costs 16.7% less ($500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.0 (TITAN RTX) vs 6.7 (TITAN V) — the TITAN RTX offers 19.4% better value. The TITAN RTX is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | TITAN RTX | TITAN V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499-17% | $2999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.0+19% | 6.7 |
| Codename | TU102 | GV100 |
| Release | December 18 2018 | December 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #91 | #109 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












