
Radeon Pro W5500
Popular choices:

Tesla P4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro W5500
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 148.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.3 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 125W vs 75W.
- ❌43.5% longer card at 241mm vs 168mm.
Tesla P4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 125W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 241mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌150.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 22.3 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Radeon Pro W5500
2020Tesla P4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 148.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.3 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 125W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 241mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 125W vs 75W.
- ❌43.5% longer card at 241mm vs 168mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌150.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 22.3 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Tesla P4 better than Radeon Pro W5500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro W5500 make more sense than Tesla P4?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5500 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5500 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 45 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5500 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 241 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 101 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5500 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 38 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5500 and Tesla P4

Radeon Pro W5500
Radeon Pro W5500
The Radeon Pro W5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1400 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,913 points. Launch price was $399.

Tesla P4
Tesla P4
The Tesla P4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 886 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,004 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro W5500 scores 8,913 and the Tesla P4 reaches 9,004 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5500 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Tesla P4 uses Pascal, both on 7 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 2,560 (Tesla P4). Raw compute: 3.942 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 5.704 TFLOPS (Tesla P4). Boost clocks: 1400 MHz vs 1114 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,913 | 9,004+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 2560+82% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.942 TFLOPS | 5.704 TFLOPS+45% |
| Boost Clock | 1400 MHz+26% | 1114 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 88 | 160+82% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro W5500 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla P4 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro W5500 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 12.1 (Tesla P4). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs NVENC 6.0 (Tesla P4). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: HEVC,H.264,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP8,VP9 (Tesla P4).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | NVENC 6.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | HEVC,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5500 draws 125W versus the Tesla P4's 75W — a 50% difference. The Tesla P4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 500W (Tesla P4). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W | 75W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 53mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 71.3 | 120.1+68% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro W5500 launched at $399 MSRP, while the Tesla P4 launched at $1000. The Radeon Pro W5500 costs 60.1% less ($601 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 22.3 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 9.0 (Tesla P4) — the Radeon Pro W5500 offers 147.8% better value. The Radeon Pro W5500 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Tesla P4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-60% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.3+148% | 9.0 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | GP104 |
| Release | February 10 2020 | September 13 2016 |
| Ranking | #294 | #293 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













