
Radeon Pro W5500
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 390X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro W5500
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 275W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 277mm, a 36mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 390X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Radeon R9 390X
2015Why buy it
- ✅32.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌7.5% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌120% higher power demand at 275W vs 125W.
- ❌14.9% longer card at 277mm vs 241mm.
Radeon Pro W5500
2020Radeon R9 390X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 275W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 277mm, a 36mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅32.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 390X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌7.5% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌120% higher power demand at 275W vs 125W.
- ❌14.9% longer card at 277mm vs 241mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon R9 390X better than Radeon Pro W5500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro W5500 make more sense than Radeon R9 390X?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 89 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 37 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 418 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 209 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 241 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 104 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 48 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5500 and Radeon R9 390X

Radeon Pro W5500
Radeon Pro W5500
The Radeon Pro W5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1400 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,913 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon R9 390X
Radeon R9 390X
The Radeon R9 390X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,278 points. Launch price was $429.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro W5500 scores 8,913 and the Radeon R9 390X reaches 9,278 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5500 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon R9 390X uses GCN 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 390X). Raw compute: 3.942 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 5.914 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 390X). Boost clocks: 1400 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,913 | 9,278+4% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 2816+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.942 TFLOPS | 5.914 TFLOPS+50% |
| Boost Clock | 1400 MHz+33% | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 88 | 176+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 512-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 390X) — the Radeon Pro W5500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 512-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 390X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 390X). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: HEVC,H.264,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon R9 390X).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | HEVC,H.264,VP9 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5500 draws 125W versus the Radeon R9 390X's 275W — a 75% difference. The Radeon Pro W5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 750W (Radeon R9 390X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 277mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W-55% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-33% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 277mm |
| Height | 111mm | 129mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 71.3+112% | 33.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro W5500 launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 390X launched at $429. The Radeon Pro W5500 costs 7% less ($30 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 22.3 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 21.6 (Radeon R9 390X) — the Radeon Pro W5500 offers 3.2% better value. The Radeon Pro W5500 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-7% | $429 |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.3+3% | 21.6 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Grenada |
| Release | February 10 2020 | June 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #294 | #287 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













