
Radeon Pro W5500
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 590
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro W5500
2020Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 175W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 590 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌43% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 22.3 vs 33.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
Radeon RX 590
2018Why buy it
- ✅39.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 49.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.4 vs 22.3 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌40% higher power demand at 175W vs 125W.
Radeon Pro W5500
2020Radeon RX 590
2018Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 175W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅39.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 49.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.4 vs 22.3 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 590 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌43% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 22.3 vs 33.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌40% higher power demand at 175W vs 125W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 590 better than Radeon Pro W5500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro W5500 make more sense than Radeon RX 590?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 27 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 419 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 335 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 201 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 241 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 150 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 105 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 227 FPS | 403 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 335 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 279 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 101 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5500 and Radeon RX 590

Radeon Pro W5500
Radeon Pro W5500
The Radeon Pro W5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1400 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,913 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 590
Radeon RX 590
The Radeon RX 590 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 15 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1469 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,315 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro W5500 scores 8,913 and the Radeon RX 590 reaches 9,315 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5500 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon RX 590 uses GCN 4.0, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 590). Raw compute: 3.942 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 7.119 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 590). Boost clocks: 1400 MHz vs 1545 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,913 | 9,315+5% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 2304+64% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.942 TFLOPS | 7.119 TFLOPS+81% |
| Boost Clock | 1400 MHz | 1545 MHz+10% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 88 | 144+64% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 590 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro W5500 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 590). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 590). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: HEVC,H.264,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX 590).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | HEVC,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5500 draws 125W versus the Radeon RX 590's 175W — a 33.3% difference. The Radeon Pro W5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 500W (Radeon RX 590). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 241mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W-29% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 71.3+34% | 53.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro W5500 launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 590 launched at $279. The Radeon RX 590 costs 30.1% less ($120 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 22.3 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 33.4 (Radeon RX 590) — the Radeon RX 590 offers 49.8% better value. The Radeon Pro W5500 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $279-30% |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.3 | 33.4+50% |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Polaris 30 |
| Release | February 10 2020 | November 15 2018 |
| Ranking | #294 | #285 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













