
L4
Popular choices:

Tesla M40
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
L4
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $155 less on MSRP ($2,345 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 72W instead of 250W, a 178W reduction.
- ✅Measures 169mm instead of 267mm, a 98mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Tesla M40
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌6.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$2,345 MSRP
- ❌247.2% higher power demand at 250W vs 72W.
- ❌58% longer card at 267mm vs 169mm.
L4
2023Tesla M40
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $155 less on MSRP ($2,345 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 72W instead of 250W, a 178W reduction.
- ✅Measures 169mm instead of 267mm, a 98mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌6.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$2,345 MSRP
- ❌247.2% higher power demand at 250W vs 72W.
- ❌58% longer card at 267mm vs 169mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Tesla M40 better than L4?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does L4 make more sense than Tesla M40?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | L4 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | L4 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 231 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 157 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 169 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | L4 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 457 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 305 FPS | 307 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 230 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 345 FPS |
| medium | 274 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 228 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 228 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 115 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | L4 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 249 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 61 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of L4 and Tesla M40

L4
L4
The L4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 795 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 72W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,153 points.

Tesla M40
Tesla M40
The Tesla M40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,220 points.
Graphics Performance
The L4 scores 10,153 and the Tesla M40 reaches 10,220 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The L4 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Tesla M40 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 7,424 (L4) vs 3,072 (Tesla M40). Raw compute: 30.29 TFLOPS (L4) vs 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40). Boost clocks: 2040 MHz vs 1112 MHz.
| Feature | L4 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,153 | 10,220 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 7424+142% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 30.29 TFLOPS+343% | 6.832 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2040 MHz+83% | 1112 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 96+20% |
| TMUs | 240+25% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 7.5 MB+582% | 1.1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1500% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | L4 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (L4) vs 3 MB (Tesla M40) — the L4 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | L4 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1500% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (L4) vs 12.0 (Tesla M40). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | L4 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (L4) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M40). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC (4x) vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (L4) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Tesla M40).
| Feature | L4 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) | NVENC 2.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC (4x) | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The L4 draws 72W versus the Tesla M40's 250W — a 110.6% difference. The L4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (L4) vs 500W (Tesla M40). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 169mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | L4 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 72W-71% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 169mm | 267mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.0+245% | 40.9 |
Value Analysis
The L4 launched at $2345 MSRP, while the Tesla M40 launched at $2500. The L4 costs 6.2% less ($155 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.3 (L4) vs 4.1 (Tesla M40) — the L4 offers 4.9% better value. The L4 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | L4 | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2345-6% | $2500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.3+5% | 4.1 |
| Codename | AD104 | GM200 |
| Release | March 21 2023 | November 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #259 | #256 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











