
Radeon RX 7600M
Popular choices:

Tesla M40 24GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 7600M
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 90W instead of 250W, a 160W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
Tesla M40 24GB
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 250W vs 90W.
Radeon RX 7600M
2023Tesla M40 24GB
2015Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 90W instead of 250W, a 160W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌177.8% higher power demand at 250W vs 90W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7600M better than Tesla M40 24GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla M40 24GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 7600M | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 7600M | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 346 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 294 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 7600M | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 495 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 396 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 319 FPS |
| ultra | 247 FPS | 239 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 371 FPS | 359 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 287 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 247 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 120 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 7600M | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 495 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 396 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 247 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 371 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 247 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 61 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7600M and Tesla M40 24GB

Radeon RX 7600M
Radeon RX 7600M
The Radeon RX 7600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2410 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,999 points.

Tesla M40 24GB
Tesla M40 24GB
The Tesla M40 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,641 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 7600M scores 10,999 and the Tesla M40 24GB reaches 10,641 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 7600M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Tesla M40 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 3,072 (Tesla M40 24GB). Raw compute: 17.27 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40 24GB). Boost clocks: 2410 MHz vs 1112 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600M | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,999+3% | 10,641 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 3072+71% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.27 TFLOPS+153% | 6.832 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2410 MHz+117% | 1112 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 112 | 192+71% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.1 MB+120% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Tesla M40 24GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600M | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 3 MB (Tesla M40 24GB) — the Tesla M40 24GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600M | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 12.1 (Tesla M40 24GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600M | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600M) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla M40 24GB). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7600M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla M40 24GB).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600M | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7600M draws 90W versus the Tesla M40 24GB's 250W — a 94.1% difference. The Radeon RX 7600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 500W (Tesla M40 24GB). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600M | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 90W-64% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 122.2+187% | 42.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7600M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600M | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2000 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GM200 |
| Release | January 4 2023 | November 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #248 | #253 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












