
Radeon RX 7600M
Popular choices:

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 7600M
2023Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 90W vs 35W.
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024Why buy it
- ✅Newer upscaling generation: DLSS 4 Super Resolution (2025) vs FSR 3 (2023).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 90W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon RX 7600M
2023RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Newer upscaling generation: DLSS 4 Super Resolution (2025) vs FSR 3 (2023).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 90W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌157.1% higher power demand at 90W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile better than Radeon RX 7600M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 7600M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 7600M | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 7600M | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 346 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 294 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 41 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 7600M | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 495 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 396 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 247 FPS | 251 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 371 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 301 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 247 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 126 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 7600M | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 495 FPS | 453 FPS |
| medium | 396 FPS | 386 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 247 FPS | 251 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 371 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 301 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 247 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 126 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7600M and RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Radeon RX 7600M
Radeon RX 7600M
The Radeon RX 7600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2410 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,999 points.

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 26 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 2025 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,162 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 7600M scores 10,999 and the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile reaches 11,162 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 7600M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 6 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 2,048 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 17.27 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 8.294 TFLOPS (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 2410 MHz vs 2025 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 16 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) vs 64.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600M | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,999 | 11,162+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2048+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 17.27 TFLOPS+108% | 8.294 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2410 MHz+19% | 2025 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+75% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 12 MB+500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28+75% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smooth motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7600M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600M | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 4) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 128 GB/s (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 100% advantage for the Radeon RX 7600M. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 12 MB (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600M | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s+100% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 12 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 12 (12_2) (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600M | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7600M) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600M | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7600M draws 90W versus the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile's 35W — a 88% difference. The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 7600M) vs 500W (RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600M | RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 90W | 35W-61% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 122.2 | 318.9+161% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












