
Radeon Pro Vega 48
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro Vega 48
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 90W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon RX 7600M
2023Why buy it
- ✅35.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 25.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 90W vs 30W.
Radeon Pro Vega 48
2019Radeon RX 7600M
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 90W, a 60W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅35.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 25.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 90W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7600M better than Radeon Pro Vega 48?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro Vega 48 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 31 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 192 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 54 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 331 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 254 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 323 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 244 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 124 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 297 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 247 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 124 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro Vega 48 and Radeon RX 7600M

Radeon Pro Vega 48
Radeon Pro Vega 48
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,270 points.

Radeon RX 7600M
Radeon RX 7600M
The Radeon RX 7600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2410 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,999 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 scores 11,270 and the Radeon RX 7600M reaches 10,999 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon RX 7600M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 7600M). Raw compute: 7.987 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs 17.27 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600M). Boost clocks: 1300 MHz vs 2410 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,270+2% | 10,999 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+71% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.987 TFLOPS | 17.27 TFLOPS+116% |
| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | 2410 MHz+85% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 192+71% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR 3 + AFMF |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600M has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7600M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600M) — the Radeon Pro Vega 48 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon RX 7600M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600M). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7600M).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 draws 30W versus the Radeon RX 7600M's 90W — a 100% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 48) vs 500W (Radeon RX 7600M). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-67% | 90W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 375.7+207% | 122.2 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7600M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro Vega 48 | Radeon RX 7600M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450 | — |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Navi 33 |
| Release | March 19 2019 | January 4 2023 |
| Ranking | #241 | #248 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












