Tesla C2075 vs Quadro K1200

NVIDIA

Tesla C2075

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K1200

Popular choices:

RTX 4060β€’RTX 3060β€’RTX 4060 Tiβ€’RTX 3070β€’GTX 1650β€’RTX 3060 Tiβ€’RTX 4070β€’RTX 3050

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark Score

3017

G3D Mark Score

2965

Performance Difference

Tesla C2075 is 1.8% faster than Quadro K1200

VRAM & Game Performance

VRAM (Video RAM) is dedicated memory on your graphics card that stores textures, frame buffers, and game assets. Higher VRAM allows for sharper textures at high resolutions (1440p/4K) and prevents stuttering in modern AAA games. 8GB is minimum for 1080p, 12GB+ recommended for 1440p, and 16GB+ for 4K gaming.

Tesla C2075N/A
016GB32GB
VRAM data unavailable
Quadro K12004096 MB
016GB32GB
1080pLow
10%
low47%
medium10%
high4%
ultra4%
1440pLimited
6%
low20%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%
4KLimited
4%
low4%
medium4%
high4%
ultra4%

πŸ“Š Performance Analysis

4 GB VRAM Β· 2,965 G3D Mark (entry-level)

1080pLow settings needed for 60 FPS.
1440pNot recommended. Use 1080p.
4KNot viable. Use lower resolution or heavy upscaling.

⚑Ray Tracing: RT not recommended. Keep disabled for playable FPS.

πŸš€Upscaling: Performance mode: +50-70% FPS, noticeable quality loss.

Benchmarks & Performance Comparison

In this GPU comparison, Tesla C2075 performs 1.8% better in benchmarks. Below you'll find detailed performance analysis, gaming benchmarks, power consumption data, and specifications to help you decide between Tesla C2075 and Quadro K1200.

Both graphics cards are popular choices for gaming. When comparing GPUs, consider VRAM capacity, ray tracing performance, power requirements, and price-to-performance ratio for your target gaming resolution (1080p, 1440p, or 4K).

Technical Specifications

Detailed hardware specifications for Tesla C2075 and Quadro K1200

NVIDIA

Tesla C2075

The Tesla C2075 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. Core clock: 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 247W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,017 points.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:48
TMUs:56
Vram:null
L1 Cache:896 kB
L2 Cache:768 kB
Core Clock:574 MHz
Shading Units:448
Transistor Count:3,000 million
Texture Fill Rate:32.14
Manufacturing Process:40 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):247 Watt
Floating Point Performance:1.028 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GF110
Architecture:Fermi 2.0 (2010βˆ’2014)
Release Date:July 25 2011
Performance Ranking Position:553
NVIDIA

Quadro K1200

The Quadro K1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 28 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,965 points. Launch price was $321.97.

Technical Specifications

ROPs:16
TMUs:32
Vram:4096 MB
L1 Cache:256 kB
L2 Cache:2 MB
Core Clock:954 MHz
Boost Clock:1033 MHz
Shading Units:512
Transistor Count:1,870 million
Texture Fill Rate:33.06
Manufacturing Process:28 nm
Power Consumption (TDP):45 Watt
Floating Point Performance:1.0578 TFLOPS

General Information

Codename:GM107
Architecture:Maxwell (2014βˆ’2017)
Launch Price:$321.97
Release Date:January 28 2015
Performance Ranking Position:586

Top Performing GPUs

The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores

You May Also Compare

Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla C2075 and Quadro K1200